Re: [PATCH 1/3] OMAP: VRAM: improve VRAM error prints

[Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>]

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 02:04:14PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 12:51 +0100, ext Paul Mundt wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:45:18AM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > > Improve the error prints to give more information about the offending
> > > address & size.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@nokia.com>
> > 
> > 1-3 queued for .37, thanks.
> 
> They were just for review =).
> 
> If it's ok to you, I'll pick all OMAP display related patches to my
> tree, and send you a pull request when I think they are ready.
> 
I wasn't sure what your intentions were, but that's of course fine, too!

Please keep an eye on the -rc timing however, so we don't end up with
bigger things piling up in the later -rc stages and then have to start
cherry-picking the urgent bits.

> But for these three patches it's ok if you already queued them: they are
> quite high priority, as the OMAP framebuffer doesn't work at all without
> the second patch.
> 
Right. I looked through the OMAP list archives for some context on these
first and since the second one was at least a build fix I assumed you
wanted to get them merged sooner rather than later.