From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 19702] i5-450M CPU gets stuck in low/lowest state
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:51:16 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201011101251.oAACpGjG032016@demeter2.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-19702-12968@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19702
Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DOCUMENTED
--- Comment #50 from Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> 2010-11-10 12:51:11 ---
> Will the scheduler adapt to the changed cpu features with only that single
> change?
Yes, the only part I found using it always checks for:
if (has_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF))
use_it()
So unsetting the cap effectively disables usage there on the next schedule.
This may change in the future, as said it's a hack...
Perfect would be a boot param disbable_cpu_cap=xy, but as most of these caps
are evaluated early it's hard to implement.
vyncere: Looks like Linux works correctly according to your BIOS settings :)
Not sure whether I should set this invalid. I set it documented, if there are
more machines with broken aperf/mperf timers, they might find it and if this
should be a more common issue, it still can be thought of a fix/workaround for
the kernel.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-10 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-19702-12968@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2010-10-04 6:42 ` [Bug 19702] i5-450M CPU gets stuck in low/lowest state bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-04 6:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-04 6:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-08 5:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-08 12:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-08 19:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-08 19:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-12 11:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-14 5:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-14 5:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-14 9:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-14 9:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-14 15:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-15 10:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-15 10:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-15 10:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-15 17:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-15 19:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-15 19:37 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-16 8:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-16 9:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-19 2:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-19 3:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-19 3:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-19 3:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-19 7:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-19 9:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-19 14:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-19 22:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-28 15:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-28 15:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-29 11:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-29 12:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-29 13:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-29 15:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-29 20:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-29 20:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-01 10:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-01 13:42 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-01 17:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-01 18:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-01 18:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-02 7:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-02 8:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-02 9:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-03 20:42 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-04 8:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-04 8:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-08 12:32 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-08 12:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-09 17:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-10 11:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-10 12:51 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2011-07-31 17:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-08-01 7:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-08-11 13:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-08-12 13:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-08-15 15:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-08-15 15:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-06-18 19:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201011101251.oAACpGjG032016@demeter2.kernel.org \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.