From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 19702] i5-450M CPU gets stuck in low/lowest state
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:00:05 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201108111300.p7BD05YC022007@demeter1.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-19702-12968@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19702
David Tomaschik <david@systemoverlord.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |david@systemoverlord.com
--- Comment #53 from David Tomaschik <david@systemoverlord.com> 2011-08-11 12:59:49 ---
I believe I'm having a similar problem. My hardware is a Dell Latitude E5420
with an i5-2520M CPU. I have the latest Dell BIOS for this system. I'm
currently on the Ubuntu kernel 2.6.38-10-generic, and after I resume from
suspend, CPU frequency scaling no longer works. Before suspending,
cpufreq-aperf shows sane values. Afterwards, it gives frequencies of about
625MHz:
cpufreq-aperf
CPU Average freq(KHz) Time in C0 Time in Cx C0 percentage
000 0625250 00 sec 077 ms 00 sec 922 ms 07
001 0625250 00 sec 007 ms 00 sec 992 ms 00
002 0600240 00 sec 098 ms 00 sec 901 ms 09
003 0625250 00 sec 002 ms 00 sec 997 ms 00
I believe that, because of this, the cpufreq scaling won't bump things up.
"That is the reason why the cpufreq subsystem, taking aperf values to
calculate the next frequency into account never raises the frequency."
Any idea why it would only occur after a suspend/resume cycle and what I can do
to fix the issue?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-11 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-19702-12968@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2010-10-04 6:42 ` [Bug 19702] i5-450M CPU gets stuck in low/lowest state bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-04 6:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-04 6:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-08 5:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-08 12:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-08 19:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-08 19:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-12 11:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-14 5:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-14 5:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-14 9:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-14 9:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-14 15:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-15 10:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-15 10:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-15 10:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-15 17:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-15 19:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-15 19:37 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-16 8:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-16 9:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-19 2:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-19 3:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-19 3:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-19 3:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-19 7:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-19 9:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-19 14:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-19 22:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-28 15:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-28 15:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-29 11:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-29 12:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-29 13:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-29 15:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-29 20:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-10-29 20:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-01 10:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-01 13:42 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-01 17:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-01 18:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-01 18:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-02 7:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-02 8:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-02 9:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-03 20:42 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-04 8:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-04 8:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-08 12:32 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-08 12:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-09 17:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-10 11:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-11-10 12:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-07-31 17:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-08-01 7:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-08-11 13:00 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2011-08-12 13:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-08-15 15:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-08-15 15:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-06-18 19:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201108111300.p7BD05YC022007@demeter1.kernel.org \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.