From: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmci: handle clock frequency 0 properly
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:34:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101117003429.GA2578@void.printf.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289927869-14519-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
Hi Linus,
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:17:49PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This removes the default clocking for the MMCI controller so that
> the external MCI card clock does not activate until the first
> .set_ios() call is issued. It will further handle the transitions
> from a clock != 0 to 0 and vice versa by gating/ungating the
> clock with clk_disable()/clk_enable().
>
> This assures that the MCI clock will not be active unless there
> is a card in the MMC slot.
>
> By default the MMC core will not gate off the clock to a card
> once it's enabled, but with the separate patch for aggressive
> clocking this can optionally be enabled for the system.
>
> Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
> ---
> Changes since v8:
>
> The frequency registers shall be set with mmci_set_clkreg()
> no matter whether the clock gets enabled or disabled, systems
> without a clk framework will need this so that the clock
> dividers are set to the apropriate values for clock 0 as
> well, and that will probably mitigate power consumption
> somewhat on these systems.
>
> Chris: this is a new version after Russell found an error in
> it. Can you please take the old version of this patch out of
> the MMC tree so I can merge it through Russells ARM tree
> instead? The patches are perfectly orthogonal so it doesn't
> need to live in the MMC tree.
Okay, this patch has been removed from mmc-next now.
(I'm holding off on pulling the rest of your latest patchset until
you reply to David Vrabel's review of [2/3] -- let me know if you
think it should be pulled now instead.)
Thanks,
--
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: cjb@laptop.org (Chris Ball)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mmci: handle clock frequency 0 properly
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:34:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101117003429.GA2578@void.printf.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289927869-14519-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
Hi Linus,
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:17:49PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This removes the default clocking for the MMCI controller so that
> the external MCI card clock does not activate until the first
> .set_ios() call is issued. It will further handle the transitions
> from a clock != 0 to 0 and vice versa by gating/ungating the
> clock with clk_disable()/clk_enable().
>
> This assures that the MCI clock will not be active unless there
> is a card in the MMC slot.
>
> By default the MMC core will not gate off the clock to a card
> once it's enabled, but with the separate patch for aggressive
> clocking this can optionally be enabled for the system.
>
> Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
> ---
> Changes since v8:
>
> The frequency registers shall be set with mmci_set_clkreg()
> no matter whether the clock gets enabled or disabled, systems
> without a clk framework will need this so that the clock
> dividers are set to the apropriate values for clock 0 as
> well, and that will probably mitigate power consumption
> somewhat on these systems.
>
> Chris: this is a new version after Russell found an error in
> it. Can you please take the old version of this patch out of
> the MMC tree so I can merge it through Russells ARM tree
> instead? The patches are perfectly orthogonal so it doesn't
> need to live in the MMC tree.
Okay, this patch has been removed from mmc-next now.
(I'm holding off on pulling the rest of your latest patchset until
you reply to David Vrabel's review of [2/3] -- let me know if you
think it should be pulled now instead.)
Thanks,
--
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-17 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-16 17:17 [PATCH] mmci: handle clock frequency 0 properly Linus Walleij
2010-11-16 17:17 ` Linus Walleij
2010-11-16 17:17 ` Linus Walleij
2010-11-17 0:34 ` Chris Ball [this message]
2010-11-17 0:34 ` Chris Ball
2010-12-04 12:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-04 12:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101117003429.GA2578@void.printf.net \
--to=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.