All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] writeback: IO-less balance_dirty_pages()
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:19:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101117041926.GA14209@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101117035905.525232375@intel.com>

> BEHAVIOR CHANGE
> ===============
> 
> Users will notice that the applications will get throttled once the
> crossing the global (background + dirty)/2=15% threshold. For a single
> "cp", it could be soft throttled at 2*bdi->write_bandwidth around 15%

s/2/8/

Sorry, the initial soft throttle bandwidth for "cp" is about 8 times
of bdi bandwidth when reaching 15% dirty pages.

> dirty pages, and be balanced at speed bdi->write_bandwidth around 17.5%
> dirty pages. Before patch, the behavior is to just throttle it at 17.5%
> dirty pages.
> 
> Since the task will be soft throttled earlier than before, it may be
> perceived by end users as performance "slow down" if his application
> happens to dirty more than ~15% memory.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] writeback: IO-less balance_dirty_pages()
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:19:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101117041926.GA14209@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101117035905.525232375@intel.com>

> BEHAVIOR CHANGE
> ===============
> 
> Users will notice that the applications will get throttled once the
> crossing the global (background + dirty)/2=15% threshold. For a single
> "cp", it could be soft throttled at 2*bdi->write_bandwidth around 15%

s/2/8/

Sorry, the initial soft throttle bandwidth for "cp" is about 8 times
of bdi bandwidth when reaching 15% dirty pages.

> dirty pages, and be balanced at speed bdi->write_bandwidth around 17.5%
> dirty pages. Before patch, the behavior is to just throttle it at 17.5%
> dirty pages.
> 
> Since the task will be soft throttled earlier than before, it may be
> perceived by end users as performance "slow down" if his application
> happens to dirty more than ~15% memory.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-17  4:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-17  3:58 [PATCH 01/13] writeback: IO-less balance_dirty_pages() Wu Fengguang
2010-11-17  3:58 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-17  3:58 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-17  4:19 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2010-11-17  4:19   ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-17  8:33   ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-17  8:33     ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-17  4:30 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-17  4:30   ` Wu Fengguang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-17  4:27 [PATCH 00/13] IO-less dirty throttling v2 Wu Fengguang
2010-11-17  4:27 ` [PATCH 01/13] writeback: IO-less balance_dirty_pages() Wu Fengguang
2010-11-17  4:27   ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-17  4:27   ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-17 10:34   ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-17 10:34     ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-22  2:01     ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-22  2:01       ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-22  2:01       ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-17 23:08   ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-17 23:08     ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-17 23:08     ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-18 13:04   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-18 13:04     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-18 13:26     ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-18 13:26       ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-18 13:40       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-18 13:40         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-18 14:02         ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-18 14:02           ` Wu Fengguang
     [not found]     ` <20101129151719.GA30590@localhost>
     [not found]       ` <1291064013.32004.393.camel@laptop>
     [not found]         ` <20101130043735.GA22947@localhost>
     [not found]           ` <1291156522.32004.1359.camel@laptop>
     [not found]             ` <1291156765.32004.1365.camel@laptop>
     [not found]               ` <20101201133818.GA13377@localhost>
2010-12-01 23:03                 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-01 23:03                   ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-02  1:56                   ` Wu Fengguang
2010-12-02  1:56                     ` Wu Fengguang
2010-12-05 16:14                 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-12-06  2:42                   ` Ted Ts'o
2010-12-06  2:42                     ` Ted Ts'o
2010-12-06  9:52                     ` Dmitry
2010-12-06  9:52                       ` Dmitry
2010-12-06  9:52                       ` Dmitry
2010-12-06 12:34                       ` Ted Ts'o
2010-12-06 12:34                         ` Ted Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101117041926.GA14209@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.