From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: base: core: do not put noninitialized devices
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 20:57:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101119205709.GA17531@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101119191424.GA12273@albatros>
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:14:25PM +0300, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:02 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 09:41:40PM +0300, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> > > If kobject_set_name_vargs() fails then put_device() frees
> > > device with zero kobj->state_initialized. This leads to WARN().
> >
> > Have you seen this happen?
>
> No, I've just analized the code. Without device_initialize() ->kobj is
> not initialized:
>
> kobject_init(&dev->kobj, &device_ktype) calls
>
> kobject_init_internal(kobj) calls
>
> kobj->state_initialized = 1;
>
> kobject_put() calls WARN if state_initialized = 0:
>
> void kobject_put(struct kobject *kobj)
> {
> if (kobj) {
> if (!kobj->state_initialized)
> WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "kobject: '%s' (%p): is not "
> "initialized, yet kobject_put() is being "
> "called.\n", kobject_name(kobj), kobj);
>
>
> I got the stack dump with similar code:
>
> struct device *dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> put_device(dev);
Sure, that's illegal code, and we want to warn about that. So I would
say, if an error happens, we want to see this message so the code should
stay as-is.
thanks,
greg k-h
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: base: core: do not put noninitialized devices
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:57:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101119205709.GA17531@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101119191424.GA12273@albatros>
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:14:25PM +0300, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:02 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 09:41:40PM +0300, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> > > If kobject_set_name_vargs() fails then put_device() frees
> > > device with zero kobj->state_initialized. This leads to WARN().
> >
> > Have you seen this happen?
>
> No, I've just analized the code. Without device_initialize() ->kobj is
> not initialized:
>
> kobject_init(&dev->kobj, &device_ktype) calls
>
> kobject_init_internal(kobj) calls
>
> kobj->state_initialized = 1;
>
> kobject_put() calls WARN if state_initialized == 0:
>
> void kobject_put(struct kobject *kobj)
> {
> if (kobj) {
> if (!kobj->state_initialized)
> WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "kobject: '%s' (%p): is not "
> "initialized, yet kobject_put() is being "
> "called.\n", kobject_name(kobj), kobj);
>
>
> I got the stack dump with similar code:
>
> struct device *dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> put_device(dev);
Sure, that's illegal code, and we want to warn about that. So I would
say, if an error happens, we want to see this message so the code should
stay as-is.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-19 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-19 18:41 [PATCH] drivers: base: core: do not put noninitialized devices Vasiliy Kulikov
2010-11-19 18:41 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2010-11-19 19:02 ` Greg KH
2010-11-19 19:02 ` Greg KH
2010-11-19 19:14 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2010-11-19 19:14 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2010-11-19 19:17 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2010-11-19 19:17 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2010-11-19 20:57 ` Greg KH [this message]
2010-11-19 20:57 ` Greg KH
2010-11-20 9:00 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2010-11-20 9:00 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101119205709.GA17531@suse.de \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=segoon@openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.