From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: XFS reclaim lock order bug
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:18:02 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101123121802.GA4785@amd> (raw)
Hi,
IIRC I've reported this before. Perhaps it is a false positive, but even
so it is still annoying that it triggers and turns off lockdep for
subsequent debugging.
Any chance it can get fixed or properly annotated?
Thanks,
Nick
[ 286.895008]
[ 286.895010] =================================
[ 286.895020] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
[ 286.895020] 2.6.37-rc3+ #28
[ 286.895020] ---------------------------------
[ 286.895020] inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-R} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage.
[ 286.895020] rm/1844 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
[ 286.895020] (&(&ip->i_iolock)->mr_lock#2){++++-+}, at: [<ffffffffa0067e58>] xfs_ilock+0xe8/0x1e0 [xfs]
[ 286.895020] {RECLAIM_FS-ON-R} state was registered at:
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff8108380b>] mark_held_locks+0x6b/0xa0
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff810838d1>] lockdep_trace_alloc+0x91/0xd0
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff810d1851>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x91/0x780
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff8110a043>] alloc_page_vma+0x93/0x150
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff810ed909>] handle_mm_fault+0x719/0x9a0
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff816068e3>] do_page_fault+0x133/0x4f0
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff816039df>] page_fault+0x1f/0x30
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff810cb52a>] generic_file_aio_read+0x2fa/0x730
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffffa009a29b>] xfs_file_aio_read+0x15b/0x390 [xfs]
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff81117812>] do_sync_read+0xd2/0x110
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff81117b55>] vfs_read+0xc5/0x190
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff8111846c>] sys_read+0x4c/0x80
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff8100312b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 286.895020] irq event stamp: 1095103
[ 286.895020] hardirqs last enabled at (1095103): [<ffffffff81603215>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x65/0x80
[ 286.895020] hardirqs last disabled at (1095102): [<ffffffff81602be7>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x17/0x60
[ 286.895020] softirqs last enabled at (1093048): [<ffffffff81050c4e>] __do_softirq+0x16e/0x360
[ 286.895020] softirqs last disabled at (1093009): [<ffffffff81003fcc>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x50
[ 286.895020]
[ 286.895020] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 286.895020] 3 locks held by rm/1844:
[ 286.895020] #0: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81124cdc>] do_lookup+0xfc/0x170
[ 286.895020] #1: (shrinker_rwsem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff810d8f68>] shrink_slab+0x38/0x190
[ 286.895020] #2: (&pag->pag_ici_reclaim_lock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa00a2944>] xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag+0xa4/0x370 [xfs]
[ 286.895020]
[ 286.895020] stack backtrace:
[ 286.895020] Pid: 1844, comm: rm Not tainted 2.6.37-rc3+ #28
[ 286.895020] Call Trace:
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff810828f0>] print_usage_bug+0x170/0x180
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff810835b1>] mark_lock+0x211/0x400
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff810841ae>] __lock_acquire+0x40e/0x1490
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff810852c5>] lock_acquire+0x95/0x1b0
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffffa0067e58>] ? xfs_ilock+0xe8/0x1e0 [xfs]
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffffa00a2774>] ? xfs_reclaim_inode+0x174/0x2a0 [xfs]
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff81073c3a>] down_write_nested+0x4a/0x70
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffffa0067e58>] ? xfs_ilock+0xe8/0x1e0 [xfs]
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffffa0067e58>] xfs_ilock+0xe8/0x1e0 [xfs]
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffffa00a27c0>] xfs_reclaim_inode+0x1c0/0x2a0 [xfs]
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffffa00a2aaf>] xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag+0x20f/0x370 [xfs]
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffffa00a2c88>] xfs_reclaim_inode_shrink+0x78/0x80 [xfs]
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff810d9057>] shrink_slab+0x127/0x190
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff810dbf09>] zone_reclaim+0x349/0x420
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff810cf815>] ? zone_watermark_ok+0x25/0xe0
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff810d1603>] get_page_from_freelist+0x673/0x830
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff8110c013>] ? init_object+0x43/0x80
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffffa00929ec>] ? kmem_zone_alloc+0x8c/0xd0 [xfs]
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff8108380b>] ? mark_held_locks+0x6b/0xa0
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff8108380b>] ? mark_held_locks+0x6b/0xa0
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff810d18d0>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x110/0x780
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff8110eb3a>] ? unfreeze_slab+0x11a/0x160
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff811089d6>] alloc_pages_current+0x76/0xf0
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff8110ce45>] new_slab+0x205/0x2b0
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff8110ef7c>] __slab_alloc+0x30c/0x480
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff8112f372>] ? d_alloc+0x22/0x200
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff8112f372>] ? d_alloc+0x22/0x200
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff8112f372>] ? d_alloc+0x22/0x200
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff8110fe18>] kmem_cache_alloc+0xf8/0x1a0
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff8112f1e0>] ? __d_lookup+0x1c0/0x1f0
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff8112f020>] ? __d_lookup+0x0/0x1f0
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff8112f372>] d_alloc+0x22/0x200
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff811236fb>] d_alloc_and_lookup+0x2b/0x90
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff8112f24c>] ? d_lookup+0x3c/0x60
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff81124cfa>] do_lookup+0x11a/0x170
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff81125a4a>] link_path_walk+0x31a/0xa50
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff81126292>] path_walk+0x62/0xe0
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff8112636b>] do_path_lookup+0x5b/0x60
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff81126fe2>] user_path_at+0x52/0xa0
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff8110e8d5>] ? kmem_cache_free+0xe5/0x190
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff81083b4d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff81126760>] ? do_unlinkat+0x60/0x1d0
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff8111d077>] vfs_fstatat+0x37/0x70
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff8111d21f>] sys_newfstatat+0x1f/0x50
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff81083afd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x13d/0x180
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff816028c9>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[ 286.895020] [<ffffffff8100312b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next reply other threads:[~2010-11-23 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-23 12:18 Nick Piggin [this message]
2010-11-23 21:12 ` XFS reclaim lock order bug Dave Chinner
2010-11-24 0:58 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-24 2:26 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-24 20:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-25 3:48 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-25 6:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-25 7:08 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-25 7:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-25 10:32 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-25 10:29 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-25 10:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-25 11:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-25 11:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101123121802.GA4785@amd \
--to=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.