From: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
To: Per Fransson <per.xx.fransson@stericsson.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Add call to non-crashing cores through IPI
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 22:06:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101126040612.GA6598@lixom.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1290587308-22038-1-git-send-email-per.xx.fransson@stericsson.com>
Hi,
Just a couple of nitpicks below. It's also common to prefix the patch
subject with the subsystem (i.e. "ARM: kexec: ...")
-Olof
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 09:28:28AM +0100, Per Fransson wrote:
> v2 changes:
> * the interrupts of the calling core are no longer disabled
> before performing the IPI
> ---
>
> When kexec is used to start a crash kernel the other cores
> are notified. These non-crashing cores will save their state
> in the crash notes and then do nothing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Per Fransson <per.xx.fransson@stericsson.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c b/arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> index 3a8fd51..57a7f2f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ extern unsigned long kexec_indirection_page;
> extern unsigned long kexec_mach_type;
> extern unsigned long kexec_boot_atags;
>
> +static atomic_t waiting_for_crash_ipi;
> +
> /*
> * Provide a dummy crash_notes definition while crash dump arrives to arm.
> * This prevents breakage of crash_notes attribute in kernel/ksysfs.c.
> @@ -37,9 +39,34 @@ void machine_kexec_cleanup(struct kimage *image)
> {
> }
>
> +void machine_crash_nonpanic_core(void *unused)
> +{
> + struct pt_regs regs;
> +
> + crash_setup_regs(®s, NULL);
> + printk(KERN_EMERG "CPU %u will stop doing anything useful since another CPU has crashed\n",
> + smp_processor_id());
No other architecture has verbose output like this. Maybe lower it to
KERN_DEBUG if you feel it's needed on a production kernel?
> + crash_save_cpu(®s, smp_processor_id());
> + flush_cache_all();
> +
> + atomic_dec(&waiting_for_crash_ipi);
> + while (1)
> + cpu_relax();
> +}
> +
> void machine_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> + unsigned long msecs;
Int should be enough here? Not that it makes a difference on ARM, but
anyway. :)
> +
> local_irq_disable();
> +
> + atomic_set(&waiting_for_crash_ipi, num_online_cpus() - 1);
> + smp_call_function(machine_crash_nonpanic_core, NULL, false);
> + msecs = 1000; /* Wait at most a second for the other cpus to stop */
> + while ((atomic_read(&waiting_for_crash_ipi) > 0) && msecs) {
> + mdelay(1);
> + msecs--;
> + }
If anything, logging here if not all cpus were stopped would be more
useful.
> crash_save_cpu(regs, smp_processor_id());
>
> printk(KERN_INFO "Loading crashdump kernel...\n");
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] Add call to non-crashing cores through IPI
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 22:06:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101126040612.GA6598@lixom.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1290587308-22038-1-git-send-email-per.xx.fransson@stericsson.com>
Hi,
Just a couple of nitpicks below. It's also common to prefix the patch
subject with the subsystem (i.e. "ARM: kexec: ...")
-Olof
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 09:28:28AM +0100, Per Fransson wrote:
> v2 changes:
> * the interrupts of the calling core are no longer disabled
> before performing the IPI
> ---
>
> When kexec is used to start a crash kernel the other cores
> are notified. These non-crashing cores will save their state
> in the crash notes and then do nothing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Per Fransson <per.xx.fransson@stericsson.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c b/arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> index 3a8fd51..57a7f2f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ extern unsigned long kexec_indirection_page;
> extern unsigned long kexec_mach_type;
> extern unsigned long kexec_boot_atags;
>
> +static atomic_t waiting_for_crash_ipi;
> +
> /*
> * Provide a dummy crash_notes definition while crash dump arrives to arm.
> * This prevents breakage of crash_notes attribute in kernel/ksysfs.c.
> @@ -37,9 +39,34 @@ void machine_kexec_cleanup(struct kimage *image)
> {
> }
>
> +void machine_crash_nonpanic_core(void *unused)
> +{
> + struct pt_regs regs;
> +
> + crash_setup_regs(®s, NULL);
> + printk(KERN_EMERG "CPU %u will stop doing anything useful since another CPU has crashed\n",
> + smp_processor_id());
No other architecture has verbose output like this. Maybe lower it to
KERN_DEBUG if you feel it's needed on a production kernel?
> + crash_save_cpu(®s, smp_processor_id());
> + flush_cache_all();
> +
> + atomic_dec(&waiting_for_crash_ipi);
> + while (1)
> + cpu_relax();
> +}
> +
> void machine_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> + unsigned long msecs;
Int should be enough here? Not that it makes a difference on ARM, but
anyway. :)
> +
> local_irq_disable();
> +
> + atomic_set(&waiting_for_crash_ipi, num_online_cpus() - 1);
> + smp_call_function(machine_crash_nonpanic_core, NULL, false);
> + msecs = 1000; /* Wait at most a second for the other cpus to stop */
> + while ((atomic_read(&waiting_for_crash_ipi) > 0) && msecs) {
> + mdelay(1);
> + msecs--;
> + }
If anything, logging here if not all cpus were stopped would be more
useful.
> crash_save_cpu(regs, smp_processor_id());
>
> printk(KERN_INFO "Loading crashdump kernel...\n");
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-26 4:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-24 8:28 [PATCH v2] Add call to non-crashing cores through IPI Per Fransson
2010-11-24 8:28 ` Per Fransson
2010-11-25 8:51 ` Mika Westerberg
2010-11-25 8:51 ` Mika Westerberg
2010-11-26 4:06 ` Olof Johansson [this message]
2010-11-26 4:06 ` Olof Johansson
2010-11-29 12:46 ` Per Fransson
2010-11-29 12:46 ` Per Fransson
2010-11-29 17:47 ` Olof Johansson
2010-11-29 17:47 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101126040612.GA6598@lixom.net \
--to=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=per.xx.fransson@stericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.