From: "K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: ppc_set_hwdebug vs ptrace_set_debugreg
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:52:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101129072233.GA15560@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2lj4ezhhd.fsf@igel.home>
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 08:36:30PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Why does ptrace_set_debugreg call register_user_hw_breakpoint, but
> ppc_set_hwdebug doesn't? Shouldn't ppc_set_hwdebug set the
> DABR_DATA_(READ|WRITE|TRANSLATION) bits in the dabr?
>
> Andreas.
The hw-breakpoint interfaces were initially planned for the old ptrace
option PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG,while, the newer ptrace options are mostly
to exploit the advanced debug features of Book3E processors.
Although ppc_set_hwdebug() can set DABR through set_dabr() in
arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c, it is good to have it converted to use
register_user_hw_breakpoint(). This was planned to be done alongside the
conversion of all ptrace options enabled by CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS,
which is yet to be done.
Are you looking to use debug registers through perf, or somesuch, that
you need register_user_hw_breakpoint() to be used for these new ptrace
flags?
Thanks,
K.Prasad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-29 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-27 19:36 ppc_set_hwdebug vs ptrace_set_debugreg Andreas Schwab
2010-11-29 7:22 ` K.Prasad [this message]
2010-11-29 10:15 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-01 4:37 ` K.Prasad
2010-12-13 8:26 ` K.Prasad
2010-12-13 19:05 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-14 12:54 ` K.Prasad
2010-12-14 18:59 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-16 17:07 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-01-02 12:54 ` K.Prasad
2011-01-02 14:58 ` Andreas Schwab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101129072233.GA15560@in.ibm.com \
--to=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.