From: "K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: ppc_set_hwdebug vs ptrace_set_debugreg
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:24:27 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101214125427.GA2443@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2vd2x1ojj.fsf@igel.home>
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 08:05:36PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> "K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
> > + /* Create a new breakpoint request if one doesn't exist already */
> > + hw_breakpoint_init(&attr);
> > + attr.bp_addr = bp_info->addr & ~HW_BREAKPOINT_ALIGN;
> > + arch_bp_generic_fields(bp_info->addr &
> > + (DABR_DATA_WRITE | DABR_DATA_READ),
> > + &attr.bp_type);
> > +
> > + bp = register_user_hw_breakpoint(&attr, ptrace_triggered, task);
> > + if (IS_ERR(bp))
> > + return PTR_ERR(bp);
> > +
> > + child->thread.ptrace_bps[0] = bp;
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT */
> > +
> > child->thread.dabr = (unsigned long)bp_info->addr;
>
> That cannot work, see
> <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel/71418>.
>
Ok. The above patch makes it a bit easy.
How about the revised patch below? It is only compile-tested; have you
got a quick test case that I can run?
Enable PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG and PPC_PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG to use the generic
hardware breakpoint interfaces. This helps prevent conflict for the use of
DABR register in the absence of CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS and when
PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG/PTRACE_GET_DEBUGREG flags are used by ptrace.
Signed-off-by: K.Prasad <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6.set_hwdebug/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.set_hwdebug.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ linux-2.6.set_hwdebug/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -1316,6 +1316,10 @@ static int set_dac_range(struct task_str
static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child,
struct ppc_hw_breakpoint *bp_info)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
+ struct perf_event *bp;
+ struct perf_event_attr attr;
+#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT */
#ifndef CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS
unsigned long dabr;
#endif
@@ -1365,6 +1369,10 @@ static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_
if (child->thread.dabr)
return -ENOSPC;
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
+ if (child->thread.ptrace_bps[0])
+ return -ENOSPC;
+#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT */
if ((unsigned long)bp_info->addr >= TASK_SIZE)
return -EIO;
@@ -1376,6 +1384,20 @@ static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_
if (bp_info->trigger_type & PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_WRITE)
dabr |= DABR_DATA_WRITE;
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
+ /* Create a new breakpoint request if one doesn't exist already */
+ hw_breakpoint_init(&attr);
+ attr.bp_addr = dabr & ~HW_BREAKPOINT_ALIGN;
+ arch_bp_generic_fields(dabr & (DABR_DATA_WRITE | DABR_DATA_READ),
+ &attr.bp_type);
+
+ bp = register_user_hw_breakpoint(&attr, ptrace_triggered, child);
+ if (IS_ERR(bp))
+ return PTR_ERR(bp);
+
+ child->thread.ptrace_bps[0] = bp;
+#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT */
+
child->thread.dabr = dabr;
return 1;
@@ -1405,6 +1427,16 @@ static long ppc_del_hwdebug(struct task_
return -EINVAL;
if (child->thread.dabr == 0)
return -ENOENT;
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
+ /*
+ * There is no way by which address in ptrace_bps[0] and thread.dabr
+ * can be different. So we don't explicitly check if they're the same
+ */
+ if (child->thread.ptrace_bps[0]) {
+ unregister_hw_breakpoint(child->thread.ptrace_bps[0]);
+ child->thread.ptrace_bps[0] = NULL;
+ }
+#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT */
child->thread.dabr = 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-14 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-27 19:36 ppc_set_hwdebug vs ptrace_set_debugreg Andreas Schwab
2010-11-29 7:22 ` K.Prasad
2010-11-29 10:15 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-01 4:37 ` K.Prasad
2010-12-13 8:26 ` K.Prasad
2010-12-13 19:05 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-14 12:54 ` K.Prasad [this message]
2010-12-14 18:59 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-16 17:07 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-01-02 12:54 ` K.Prasad
2011-01-02 14:58 ` Andreas Schwab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101214125427.GA2443@in.ibm.com \
--to=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.