All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: Rename lumpy_mode to reclaim_mode fix
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 12:03:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101202120347.GS13268@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101201102732.GK15564@cmpxchg.org>

As suggested by Johannes, rename reclaim_mode to reclaim_mode_t. This is
a fix to the mmotm patch
broken-out/mm-vmscan-rename-lumpy_mode-to-reclaim_mode.patch.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
---
 mm/vmscan.c |   16 ++++++++--------
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 42a4859..a9390fd 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -63,12 +63,12 @@
  * RECLAIM_MODE_COMPACTION: For high-order allocations, reclaim a number of
  *			order-0 pages and then compact the zone
  */
-typedef unsigned __bitwise__ reclaim_mode;
-#define RECLAIM_MODE_SINGLE		((__force reclaim_mode)0x01u)
-#define RECLAIM_MODE_ASYNC		((__force reclaim_mode)0x02u)
-#define RECLAIM_MODE_SYNC		((__force reclaim_mode)0x04u)
-#define RECLAIM_MODE_LUMPYRECLAIM	((__force reclaim_mode)0x08u)
-#define RECLAIM_MODE_COMPACTION		((__force reclaim_mode)0x10u)
+typedef unsigned __bitwise__ reclaim_mode_t;
+#define RECLAIM_MODE_SINGLE		((__force reclaim_mode_t)0x01u)
+#define RECLAIM_MODE_ASYNC		((__force reclaim_mode_t)0x02u)
+#define RECLAIM_MODE_SYNC		((__force reclaim_mode_t)0x04u)
+#define RECLAIM_MODE_LUMPYRECLAIM	((__force reclaim_mode_t)0x08u)
+#define RECLAIM_MODE_COMPACTION		((__force reclaim_mode_t)0x10u)
 
 struct scan_control {
 	/* Incremented by the number of inactive pages that were scanned */
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ struct scan_control {
 	 * Intend to reclaim enough continuous memory rather than reclaim
 	 * enough amount of memory. i.e, mode for high order allocation.
 	 */
-	reclaim_mode reclaim_mode;
+	reclaim_mode_t reclaim_mode;
 
 	/* Which cgroup do we reclaim from */
 	struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup;
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ unsigned long shrink_slab(unsigned long scanned, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 static void set_reclaim_mode(int priority, struct scan_control *sc,
 				   bool sync)
 {
-	reclaim_mode syncmode = sync ? RECLAIM_MODE_SYNC : RECLAIM_MODE_ASYNC;
+	reclaim_mode_t syncmode = sync ? RECLAIM_MODE_SYNC : RECLAIM_MODE_ASYNC;
 
 	/*
 	 * Initially assume we are entering either lumpy reclaim or

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: Rename lumpy_mode to reclaim_mode fix
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 12:03:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101202120347.GS13268@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101201102732.GK15564@cmpxchg.org>

As suggested by Johannes, rename reclaim_mode to reclaim_mode_t. This is
a fix to the mmotm patch
broken-out/mm-vmscan-rename-lumpy_mode-to-reclaim_mode.patch.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
---
 mm/vmscan.c |   16 ++++++++--------
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 42a4859..a9390fd 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -63,12 +63,12 @@
  * RECLAIM_MODE_COMPACTION: For high-order allocations, reclaim a number of
  *			order-0 pages and then compact the zone
  */
-typedef unsigned __bitwise__ reclaim_mode;
-#define RECLAIM_MODE_SINGLE		((__force reclaim_mode)0x01u)
-#define RECLAIM_MODE_ASYNC		((__force reclaim_mode)0x02u)
-#define RECLAIM_MODE_SYNC		((__force reclaim_mode)0x04u)
-#define RECLAIM_MODE_LUMPYRECLAIM	((__force reclaim_mode)0x08u)
-#define RECLAIM_MODE_COMPACTION		((__force reclaim_mode)0x10u)
+typedef unsigned __bitwise__ reclaim_mode_t;
+#define RECLAIM_MODE_SINGLE		((__force reclaim_mode_t)0x01u)
+#define RECLAIM_MODE_ASYNC		((__force reclaim_mode_t)0x02u)
+#define RECLAIM_MODE_SYNC		((__force reclaim_mode_t)0x04u)
+#define RECLAIM_MODE_LUMPYRECLAIM	((__force reclaim_mode_t)0x08u)
+#define RECLAIM_MODE_COMPACTION		((__force reclaim_mode_t)0x10u)
 
 struct scan_control {
 	/* Incremented by the number of inactive pages that were scanned */
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ struct scan_control {
 	 * Intend to reclaim enough continuous memory rather than reclaim
 	 * enough amount of memory. i.e, mode for high order allocation.
 	 */
-	reclaim_mode reclaim_mode;
+	reclaim_mode_t reclaim_mode;
 
 	/* Which cgroup do we reclaim from */
 	struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup;
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ unsigned long shrink_slab(unsigned long scanned, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 static void set_reclaim_mode(int priority, struct scan_control *sc,
 				   bool sync)
 {
-	reclaim_mode syncmode = sync ? RECLAIM_MODE_SYNC : RECLAIM_MODE_ASYNC;
+	reclaim_mode_t syncmode = sync ? RECLAIM_MODE_SYNC : RECLAIM_MODE_ASYNC;
 
 	/*
 	 * Initially assume we are entering either lumpy reclaim or

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-12-02 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-22 15:43 [PATCH 0/7] Use memory compaction instead of lumpy reclaim during high-order allocations V2 Mel Gorman
2010-11-22 15:43 ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-22 15:43 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: compaction: Add trace events for memory compaction activity Mel Gorman
2010-11-22 15:43   ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-22 15:43 ` [PATCH 2/7] mm: vmscan: Convert lumpy_mode into a bitmask Mel Gorman
2010-11-22 15:43   ` Mel Gorman
2010-12-01 10:27   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-12-01 10:27     ` Johannes Weiner
2010-12-01 10:50     ` Mel Gorman
2010-12-01 10:50       ` Mel Gorman
2010-12-01 11:21       ` Johannes Weiner
2010-12-01 11:21         ` Johannes Weiner
2010-12-01 11:56         ` Mel Gorman
2010-12-01 11:56           ` Mel Gorman
2010-12-02 11:04           ` Johannes Weiner
2010-12-02 11:04             ` Johannes Weiner
2010-12-02 12:03     ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2010-12-02 12:03       ` [PATCH] mm: vmscan: Rename lumpy_mode to reclaim_mode fix Mel Gorman
2010-11-22 15:43 ` [PATCH 3/7] mm: vmscan: Reclaim order-0 and use compaction instead of lumpy reclaim Mel Gorman
2010-11-22 15:43   ` Mel Gorman
2010-12-01 10:27   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-12-01 10:27     ` Johannes Weiner
2010-12-01 10:56     ` Mel Gorman
2010-12-01 10:56       ` Mel Gorman
2010-12-01 11:32       ` Johannes Weiner
2010-12-01 11:32         ` Johannes Weiner
2010-11-22 15:43 ` [PATCH 4/7] mm: migration: Allow migration to operate asynchronously and avoid synchronous compaction in the faster path Mel Gorman
2010-11-22 15:43   ` Mel Gorman
2010-12-01 10:28   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-12-01 10:28     ` Johannes Weiner
2010-11-22 15:43 ` [PATCH 5/7] mm: migration: Cleanup migrate_pages API by matching types for offlining and sync Mel Gorman
2010-11-22 15:43   ` Mel Gorman
2010-12-01 10:28   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-12-01 10:28     ` Johannes Weiner
2010-11-22 15:43 ` [PATCH 6/7] mm: compaction: Perform a faster migration scan when migrating asynchronously Mel Gorman
2010-11-22 15:43   ` Mel Gorman
2010-12-01 10:31   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-12-01 10:31     ` Johannes Weiner
2010-11-22 15:43 ` [PATCH 7/7] mm: vmscan: Rename lumpy_mode to reclaim_mode Mel Gorman
2010-11-22 15:43   ` Mel Gorman
2010-12-01 10:34   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-12-01 10:34     ` Johannes Weiner
2010-11-22 16:01 ` [PATCH 0/7] Use memory compaction instead of lumpy reclaim during high-order allocations V2 Andrea Arcangeli
2010-11-22 16:01   ` Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101202120347.GS13268@csn.ul.ie \
    --to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.