From: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] arm: Add argument to init_machine
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:24:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101208172423.GA18569@huya.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101208140722.GD9777@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:07:22PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> As far as the patch itself goes, it looks fine, but I'm not seeing
> anything using this new facility in this patch.
>
> I don't like adding things without seeing how they're going to be
> used, as sometimes these things never get used. Maybe you can give
> some examples?
We've got some new board files that can make use of it. I'll work on
getting those to a point where I can send them out. I mostly just
wanted to make sure that the idea didn't cause excessive revulsion.
Thanks,
David
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: davidb@codeaurora.org (David Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC] arm: Add argument to init_machine
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:24:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101208172423.GA18569@huya.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101208140722.GD9777@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:07:22PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> As far as the patch itself goes, it looks fine, but I'm not seeing
> anything using this new facility in this patch.
>
> I don't like adding things without seeing how they're going to be
> used, as sometimes these things never get used. Maybe you can give
> some examples?
We've got some new board files that can make use of it. I'll work on
getting those to a point where I can send them out. I mostly just
wanted to make sure that the idea didn't cause excessive revulsion.
Thanks,
David
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-08 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-08 0:42 [PATCH RFC] arm: Add argument to init_machine David Brown
2010-12-08 0:42 ` David Brown
2010-12-08 14:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-08 14:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-08 17:24 ` David Brown [this message]
2010-12-08 17:24 ` David Brown
2010-12-08 17:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-08 17:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-08 17:50 ` David Brown
2010-12-08 17:50 ` David Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101208172423.GA18569@huya.qualcomm.com \
--to=davidb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.