From: Deepak Saxena <deepak_saxena@mentor.com>
To: devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] Hide devices with non-available status from kernel
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:29:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101208192903.GA32473@mentor.com> (raw)
Device tree nodes can have a "status" property that is currently checked
for in several places in the kernel. This patch set centralizes handling
of the property and simply does not call a driver's probe() function
if a device is not available. This is of particular use in environments
where we may want to hide certain devices, for example, a multi-core
AMP environment where we are partitioning the system. The patchset
exposes all the devices in the system in /proc as that is a useful
debug tool to have in case the bootloader or user does something wrong.
Deepak Saxena (5):
of/device: Centralize checking of 'status' properties
of/device: make for_each_node* check status properties
of/device: Make of_get_next_child() check status properties
of/device: Create _of_get_next_child()
of/device: Show even unavailable nodes in procfs
arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c | 2 -
arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/suspend.c | 3 --
arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/usb.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c | 13 +------
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c | 5 ---
arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_pci.c | 15 --------
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-core.c | 3 --
drivers/net/gianfar.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/ibm_newemac/core.c | 2 +-
drivers/of/base.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
drivers/of/platform.c | 7 +++-
fs/proc/proc_devtree.c | 2 +-
include/linux/of.h | 2 +
13 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Deepak Saxena <deepak_saxena-nmGgyN9QBj3QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: devicetree-discuss-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] Hide devices with non-available status from kernel
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:29:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101208192903.GA32473@mentor.com> (raw)
Device tree nodes can have a "status" property that is currently checked
for in several places in the kernel. This patch set centralizes handling
of the property and simply does not call a driver's probe() function
if a device is not available. This is of particular use in environments
where we may want to hide certain devices, for example, a multi-core
AMP environment where we are partitioning the system. The patchset
exposes all the devices in the system in /proc as that is a useful
debug tool to have in case the bootloader or user does something wrong.
Deepak Saxena (5):
of/device: Centralize checking of 'status' properties
of/device: make for_each_node* check status properties
of/device: Make of_get_next_child() check status properties
of/device: Create _of_get_next_child()
of/device: Show even unavailable nodes in procfs
arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c | 2 -
arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/suspend.c | 3 --
arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/usb.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c | 13 +------
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c | 5 ---
arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_pci.c | 15 --------
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-core.c | 3 --
drivers/net/gianfar.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/ibm_newemac/core.c | 2 +-
drivers/of/base.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
drivers/of/platform.c | 7 +++-
fs/proc/proc_devtree.c | 2 +-
include/linux/of.h | 2 +
13 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2010-12-08 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-08 19:29 Deepak Saxena [this message]
2010-12-08 19:29 ` [PATCH 0/5] Hide devices with non-available status from kernel Deepak Saxena
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101208192903.GA32473@mentor.com \
--to=deepak_saxena@mentor.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.