All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: "Ramirez Luna, Omar" <omar.ramirez@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
	Fernando Guzman Lugo <fernando.lugo@ti.com>,
	Armando Uribe De Leon <x0095078@ti.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Ernesto Ramos Falcon <ernesto@ti.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	Rene Sapiens <rene.sapiens@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: tidspbridge: remove file handling functions for loader
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:08:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101208230802.GA8176@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikcuqWbV1xGhirL65YKRjVW=2JcdYw272a0AJSN@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 05:02:20PM -0600, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 12:09:06AM -0600, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
> >> Instead use request_firmware and friends to get a valid firmware
> >> image.
> >>
> >> Right now the image is supplied dynamically through udev and the
> >> following rule:
> >>
> >> KERNEL=="omap-dsp", SUBSYSTEM=="firmware", ACTION=="add",     \
> >>       RUN+="/bin/sh -c 'echo 1 > /sys/$DEVPATH/loading;       \
> >>               cat $FIRMWARE > /sys/$DEVPATH/data;             \
> >>               echo 0 > /sys/$DEVPATH/loading'"
> >
> > Why do you need a custom firmware rule?
> 
> It was meant as an example, when I compiled my minimal file system it
> didn't supply the firmware.sh script nor created /lib/firmware... I
> thought that not everybody would have the firmware.sh, so I just
> provided a sample rule.

So, can I remove this from the changelog comment, as it's not really
needed at all?

> >  Why doesn't the default  firmware loading rule that comes with udev work properly for you?
> > What are you needing different here that works properly for all other drivers?
> 
> firmware.sh under /lib/udev/ and dsp binaries installed under
> /lib/firmware/, my rule is the brute version of firmware.sh so nothing
> different in the script.
> 
> Probably the only change would be to supply the firmware name only, as
> of now the insmod parameter requires the entire path, e.g.:
> 
> insmod bridgedriver.ko base_img=/lib/dsp/baseimage.dof
> 
> if using firmware.sh and placing firmware files under /lib/firmware/, then
> 
> insmod bridgedriver.ko base_img=baseimage.dof

Ick, why use a module parameter name at all?  Why is this "special" and
different from all other firmware users?  They don't have to manually
specify a file name, the driver does that.

Please fix up the patch to not require a module parameter, distros hate
them, and users hate them even more.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: "Ramirez Luna, Omar" <omar.ramirez@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
	Fernando Guzman Lugo <fernando.lugo@ti.com>,
	Armando Uribe De Leon <x0095078@ti.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Ernesto Ramos Falcon <ernesto@ti.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	Rene Sapiens <rene.sapiens@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: tidspbridge: remove file handling functions for loader
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:08:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101208230802.GA8176@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikcuqWbV1xGhirL65YKRjVW=2JcdYw272a0AJSN@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 05:02:20PM -0600, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 12:09:06AM -0600, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
> >> Instead use request_firmware and friends to get a valid firmware
> >> image.
> >>
> >> Right now the image is supplied dynamically through udev and the
> >> following rule:
> >>
> >> KERNEL=="omap-dsp", SUBSYSTEM=="firmware", ACTION=="add",     \
> >>       RUN+="/bin/sh -c 'echo 1 > /sys/$DEVPATH/loading;       \
> >>               cat $FIRMWARE > /sys/$DEVPATH/data;             \
> >>               echo 0 > /sys/$DEVPATH/loading'"
> >
> > Why do you need a custom firmware rule?
> 
> It was meant as an example, when I compiled my minimal file system it
> didn't supply the firmware.sh script nor created /lib/firmware... I
> thought that not everybody would have the firmware.sh, so I just
> provided a sample rule.

So, can I remove this from the changelog comment, as it's not really
needed at all?

> >  Why doesn't the default  firmware loading rule that comes with udev work properly for you?
> > What are you needing different here that works properly for all other drivers?
> 
> firmware.sh under /lib/udev/ and dsp binaries installed under
> /lib/firmware/, my rule is the brute version of firmware.sh so nothing
> different in the script.
> 
> Probably the only change would be to supply the firmware name only, as
> of now the insmod parameter requires the entire path, e.g.:
> 
> insmod bridgedriver.ko base_img=/lib/dsp/baseimage.dof
> 
> if using firmware.sh and placing firmware files under /lib/firmware/, then
> 
> insmod bridgedriver.ko base_img=baseimage.dof

Ick, why use a module parameter name at all?  Why is this "special" and
different from all other firmware users?  They don't have to manually
specify a file name, the driver does that.

Please fix up the patch to not require a module parameter, distros hate
them, and users hate them even more.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-08 23:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-07  6:09 [PATCH] staging: tidspbridge: remove file handling functions for loader Omar Ramirez Luna
2010-12-08 22:26 ` Greg KH
2010-12-08 23:02   ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2010-12-08 23:08     ` Greg KH [this message]
2010-12-08 23:08       ` Greg KH
2010-12-08 23:32       ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2010-12-08 23:49         ` Greg KH
2010-12-08 23:49           ` Greg KH
2010-12-10 18:43           ` Ramirez Luna, Omar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101208230802.GA8176@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=ernesto@ti.com \
    --cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
    --cc=fernando.lugo@ti.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    --cc=omar.ramirez@ti.com \
    --cc=rene.sapiens@ti.com \
    --cc=x0095078@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.