[PATCH] at91: Refactor Stamp9G20 and PControl G20 board file

[christian.glindkamp@taskit.de (Christian Glindkamp)]

On 2010-12-09 18:39, Igor Plyatov wrote:
> Dear Christian,
> 
> > As PControl G20 is a carrier board for the Stamp9G20 SoM, some code can
> > be shared. Therefore board-stamp9g20.c is refactored to allow reusing the
> > SoM initialization and board-pcontrol-g20.c is modified to use it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Glindkamp <christian.glindkamp@taskit.de>
> > ---
> > 
> > How about this approach? Compile tested for PControl G20 and run time tested
> > for Stamp9G20 EVB and PortuxG20.
> > 
> > Just a side note: PortuxG20 is not a carrier board for the Stamp9G20. It just
> > shares so much with the evaluation board, that it makes sense to put them both
> > into the same file. And there is no intention to put other boards into this
> > file.
> 
> The idea from this patch is clean.
> Yours patch does not apply to the kernel from
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git,
> but I apply its content by hands and kernels compiled successfully with
> stamp9g20_defconfig and pcontrol_g20_defconfig.

I used exactly this repository. Revision 6313e3c21743cc88bb5bd8aa72948ee1e83937b6
to be precise. Maybe your mailer corrupted the patch.

> Please run ./scripts/checkpatch.pl with you patch and correct all errors
> and warnings reported. 

I only get some "line over 80 characters" warnings, which can imho be
ignored.

> 
> If you will correct this patch, to be applicable, then I will vote to
> include it into mainline.
> 
> Which kernel repository and branch should I use for the AT91 ARM?
> I just want to know - whereto send my next patch to support gms machine?
> 
> Best regards!
> --
> Igor Plyatov
>