* 4.1 and rdma
@ 2010-12-14 21:03 J. Bruce Fields
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: J. Bruce Fields @ 2010-12-14 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-nfs; +Cc: Tom Tucker
I asked Tom Tucker what he thought would be the minimum needed for our
4.1 implementation to be up-to-spec with regard to RDMA, and he took a
first look through the spec and made some notes:
http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/4.1_RDMA_issues
I don't know any big rush for 4.1/rdma, just wanted to make sure we
weren't doing anything that would make it hard to do it right later.
On the server side I think the safest thing to do may be just to return
an error on a CREATE_SESSION that arrives over an rdma connection, at
least until we figure out what more we'd need to do to support it
correctly?
--b.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2010-12-14 21:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-12-14 21:03 4.1 and rdma J. Bruce Fields
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.