From: "G, Manjunath Kondaiah" <manjugk@ti.com>
To: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Subject: Re: Last OMAP4 hwmod data cleanup for 2.6.38
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 21:33:19 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101223160319.GB1863@GLPP-machine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D135677.1080200@ti.com>
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 03:02:31PM +0100, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> The merge of both SDMA series from Manju and SR series from Thara
> changed the expected order of the hwmod data structures for OMAP4.
> In order to have a clean base for 2.6.38, and to avoid starting
> 2.6.39 with a cleanup patch again, I'd like to fix that right now.
> Even if, I do agree, this is not a big deal.
>
> I squeezed the 3 original small fixes I did (SDMA, SR and alignment)
> into one to avoid overloading your mailbox 2 days before Xmas.
>
> The patch will be available here, based on omap-for-linus.
> git://gitorious.org/omap-pm/linux.git for_2.6.38/hwmod_fixes
>
> It should not affect any functionality, and it is boot tested on
> OMAP4430/sdp.
Boot tested on SDP4430 and all DMA tests passes as expected.
Tested-by: G, Manjunath Kondaiah <manjugk@ti.com>
-Manjunath
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: manjugk@ti.com (G, Manjunath Kondaiah)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Last OMAP4 hwmod data cleanup for 2.6.38
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 21:33:19 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101223160319.GB1863@GLPP-machine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D135677.1080200@ti.com>
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 03:02:31PM +0100, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> The merge of both SDMA series from Manju and SR series from Thara
> changed the expected order of the hwmod data structures for OMAP4.
> In order to have a clean base for 2.6.38, and to avoid starting
> 2.6.39 with a cleanup patch again, I'd like to fix that right now.
> Even if, I do agree, this is not a big deal.
>
> I squeezed the 3 original small fixes I did (SDMA, SR and alignment)
> into one to avoid overloading your mailbox 2 days before Xmas.
>
> The patch will be available here, based on omap-for-linus.
> git://gitorious.org/omap-pm/linux.git for_2.6.38/hwmod_fixes
>
> It should not affect any functionality, and it is boot tested on
> OMAP4430/sdp.
Boot tested on SDP4430 and all DMA tests passes as expected.
Tested-by: G, Manjunath Kondaiah <manjugk@ti.com>
-Manjunath
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-23 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-23 14:02 Last OMAP4 hwmod data cleanup for 2.6.38 Cousson, Benoit
2010-12-23 14:02 ` Cousson, Benoit
2010-12-23 16:03 ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah [this message]
2010-12-23 16:03 ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101223160319.GB1863@GLPP-machine \
--to=manjugk@ti.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.