From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>,
spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi_imx.c: TRIVIAL mx25 & mx35 SPI_VER is 0.7
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:03:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101223190315.GD20384@angua.secretlab.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101223142934.GU14221@pengutronix.de>
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 03:29:34PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:12:10PM +0100, Richard Genoud wrote:
> > The check on cpu_is_mx25 and cpu_is_mx35 was made twice.
> > This is obviously wrong.
> obviously wrong but no wrong behaviour. Your patch only makes the code
> consistent, but IMHO it doesn't qualify as a bugfix.
>
> > Anyway, this patch won't change the previous behaviour which is
> > SPI_IMX_VER_0_7 for mx25 and mx35.
> This conflicts with
> http://mid.gmane.org/1290589546-21662-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
>
> which I prefer. The platform IDs have it correct (i.e.
>
> imx25-cspi -> 0.7
> imx31-cspi -> 0.4
> imx35-cspi -> 0.7
>
> )
Oops, missed you're reply. Okay, I've dropped Richard's patch and will look at yours.
g.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-23 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-23 11:12 [PATCH 1/2] spi_imx.c: CSPI3 irq is 0 on imx25 Richard Genoud
2010-12-23 11:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] spi_imx.c: TRIVIAL mx25 & mx35 SPI_VER is 0.7 Richard Genoud
2010-12-23 14:29 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-12-23 14:38 ` Richard Genoud
2010-12-23 19:03 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2010-12-23 19:01 ` Grant Likely
2010-12-23 18:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] spi_imx.c: CSPI3 irq is 0 on imx25 Grant Likely
2011-01-06 11:26 ` Richard Genoud
2011-01-07 14:26 ` [PATCH] spi_imx.c: correct the test on platform_get_irq() return value Richard Genoud
2011-01-07 15:26 ` Grant Likely
2011-01-07 16:41 ` Richard Genoud
2011-01-07 16:58 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101223190315.GD20384@angua.secretlab.ca \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard.genoud@gmail.com \
--cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.