[PATCH v4 5/8] arm: mxc: move IOMUX_CONFIG_XXXX definitions to iomux-v3.h

[richard.zhao@freescale.com (Richard Zhao)]

On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:32:41AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 06:29:19PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:16:39AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 02:59:36PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > > > Hello Sascha,
> > > > 
> > > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 07:25:04PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > > > > IOMUX_CONFIG_GPIO is not for iomux-v3. It's for old freescale
> > > > > iomux routines. Remove it.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@freescale.com>
> > > > > Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > > > If you don't have comments, could you please merge this patch?
> > > > It's causing arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/iomux-mx50.h incomplete.
> > > 
> > > I didn't apply it because it conflicts with current imx-for-2.6.38
> > > branch. Other than that I don't find the enum very useful at all,
> > > because we have problems with very long lines in these files and
> > > using IOMUX_CONFIG_ALT0 where we could use 0 does not exactly improve
> > > the situation.
> > Yes, correct. IOMUX_CONFIG_ALT0-7 is ok.  But IOMUX_CONFIG_SION is more
> > readable than 0x1 << 4, isn't it? If you don't agree put IOMUX_CONFIG_SION
> > in iomux-v3.h, shall I put it in iomux-mx50.h?
> 
> IOMUX_CONFIG_SION is ok, but please drop the rest.
ok to put it into iomux-v3.h? I will sent out one patch.

Richard
> 
> Sascha
> 
> 
> -- 
> Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
>