From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: Pawel Moll <mail@pawelmoll.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
Yusuke Goda <yusuke.goda.sx@renesas.com>,
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from MMC support for SuperH Mobile ARM
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:45:14 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110110154514.GC3760@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c1e9db480d82d1804930ddcc7bb0db02@rootnode.net>
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:10:19AM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 07:50:42 +0900, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
> wrote:
> >>> Documentation/arm/SH-Mobile/Makefile | 8 +
> >>> Documentation/arm/SH-Mobile/vrl4.c | 169
> >>+++++++++++++++++++++
> >>How about putting those two into "tools" (in particular "tools/arm")
> >>instead of "Documentation"?
> >>Just a thought... ;-)
> >
> >Thats fine by me except that tools/arm doesn't exist yet.
> >It would be good to get some consensus before creating it.
>
> I think there is consensus regarding "tools" as a place for user-space
> tools - eg. perf tools used to live in "Documentation/..." and then were
> moved to "tools/perf".
>
> Now, whether your stuff should be in "tools/SH-Mobile" or
> "tools/arm/SH-Mobile", I have no opinion ;-)
>
I agree that this is a worthwhile direction to move to, but we're a long
way from a consensus. x86 has traditionally littered scripts/ and others
have sunk to arch/<foo>/tools hostprogs abuse and so forth. perf is a bit
of a special case in that it's fairly architecture agnostic.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from MMC support for SuperH Mobile ARM
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:45:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110110154514.GC3760@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c1e9db480d82d1804930ddcc7bb0db02@rootnode.net>
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:10:19AM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 07:50:42 +0900, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
> wrote:
> >>> Documentation/arm/SH-Mobile/Makefile | 8 +
> >>> Documentation/arm/SH-Mobile/vrl4.c | 169
> >>+++++++++++++++++++++
> >>How about putting those two into "tools" (in particular "tools/arm")
> >>instead of "Documentation"?
> >>Just a thought... ;-)
> >
> >Thats fine by me except that tools/arm doesn't exist yet.
> >It would be good to get some consensus before creating it.
>
> I think there is consensus regarding "tools" as a place for user-space
> tools - eg. perf tools used to live in "Documentation/..." and then were
> moved to "tools/perf".
>
> Now, whether your stuff should be in "tools/SH-Mobile" or
> "tools/arm/SH-Mobile", I have no opinion ;-)
>
I agree that this is a worthwhile direction to move to, but we're a long
way from a consensus. x86 has traditionally littered scripts/ and others
have sunk to arch/<foo>/tools hostprogs abuse and so forth. perf is a bit
of a special case in that it's fairly architecture agnostic.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lethal@linux-sh.org (Paul Mundt)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from MMC support for SuperH Mobile ARM
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:45:14 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110110154514.GC3760@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c1e9db480d82d1804930ddcc7bb0db02@rootnode.net>
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:10:19AM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 07:50:42 +0900, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
> wrote:
> >>> Documentation/arm/SH-Mobile/Makefile | 8 +
> >>> Documentation/arm/SH-Mobile/vrl4.c | 169
> >>+++++++++++++++++++++
> >>How about putting those two into "tools" (in particular "tools/arm")
> >>instead of "Documentation"?
> >>Just a thought... ;-)
> >
> >Thats fine by me except that tools/arm doesn't exist yet.
> >It would be good to get some consensus before creating it.
>
> I think there is consensus regarding "tools" as a place for user-space
> tools - eg. perf tools used to live in "Documentation/..." and then were
> moved to "tools/perf".
>
> Now, whether your stuff should be in "tools/SH-Mobile" or
> "tools/arm/SH-Mobile", I have no opinion ;-)
>
I agree that this is a worthwhile direction to move to, but we're a long
way from a consensus. x86 has traditionally littered scripts/ and others
have sunk to arch/<foo>/tools hostprogs abuse and so forth. perf is a bit
of a special case in that it's fairly architecture agnostic.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-10 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-09 12:49 [PATCH] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from MMC support for SuperH Mobile ARM Simon Horman
2011-01-09 12:49 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-09 12:49 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-09 16:12 ` Paweł Moll
2011-01-09 16:12 ` Paweł Moll
2011-01-09 16:12 ` [PATCH] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from MMC support for SuperH Mobile Paweł Moll
2011-01-09 22:50 ` [PATCH] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from MMC support for SuperH Mobile ARM Simon Horman
2011-01-09 22:50 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-09 22:50 ` [PATCH] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from MMC support for SuperH Mobile Simon Horman
2011-01-10 10:10 ` [PATCH] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from MMC support for SuperH Mobile ARM Pawel Moll
2011-01-10 10:10 ` Pawel Moll
2011-01-10 10:10 ` [PATCH] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from MMC support for SuperH Mobile Pawel Moll
2011-01-10 15:45 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2011-01-10 15:45 ` [PATCH] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from MMC support for SuperH Mobile ARM Paul Mundt
2011-01-10 15:45 ` Paul Mundt
2011-01-10 22:41 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-10 22:41 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-10 22:41 ` [PATCH] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from MMC support for SuperH Mobile Simon Horman
2011-01-09 23:12 ` [PATCH] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from MMC support for SuperH Mobile ARM Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-09 23:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-09 23:12 ` [PATCH] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from MMC support for SuperH Mobile Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-09 23:52 ` [PATCH] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from MMC support for SuperH Mobile ARM Simon Horman
2011-01-09 23:52 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-09 23:52 ` [PATCH] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from MMC support for SuperH Mobile Simon Horman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-09 12:39 [PATCH] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from MMC support for SuperH Mobile ARM Simon Horman
2011-01-09 12:39 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110110154514.GC3760@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=mail@pawelmoll.com \
--cc=yusuke.goda.sx@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.