* [merged] kernel-workqueuec-remove-noop-in-workqueue.patch removed from -mm tree
@ 2011-01-10 21:30 akpm
[not found] ` <20110111143502.GD30607@htj.dyndns.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: akpm @ 2011-01-10 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dhillf, tj, mm-commits
The patch titled
kernel/workqueue.c: remove noop in workqueue
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
kernel-workqueuec-remove-noop-in-workqueue.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: kernel/workqueue.c: remove noop in workqueue
From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Checking WORKER_NOT_RUNNING in the flags word of worker is unnecessary if
it is set in the flags parameter.
Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN kernel/workqueue.c~kernel-workqueuec-remove-noop-in-workqueue kernel/workqueue.c
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c~kernel-workqueuec-remove-noop-in-workqueue
+++ a/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -770,7 +770,6 @@ static inline void worker_clr_flags(stru
/* if transitioning out of NOT_RUNNING, increment nr_running */
if ((flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING) && (oflags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING))
- if (!(worker->flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING))
atomic_inc(get_gcwq_nr_running(gcwq->cpu));
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from dhillf@gmail.com are
origin.patch
linux-next.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] workqueue: note the nested NOT_RUNNING test in worker_clr_flags() isn't a noop
[not found] ` <20110111143502.GD30607@htj.dyndns.org>
@ 2011-01-11 15:04 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2011-01-11 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm; +Cc: dhillf, mm-commits, linux-kernel
The nested NOT_RUNNING test in worker_clr_flags() is slightly
misleading in that if NOT_RUNNING were a single flag the nested test
would be always %true and thus noop. Add a comment noting that the
test isn't a noop.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
Let's avoid similar mistakes in the future. Thanks.
kernel/workqueue.c | 6 +++++-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 930c239..11869fa 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -768,7 +768,11 @@ static inline void worker_clr_flags(struct worker *worker, unsigned int flags)
worker->flags &= ~flags;
- /* if transitioning out of NOT_RUNNING, increment nr_running */
+ /*
+ * If transitioning out of NOT_RUNNING, increment nr_running. Note
+ * that the nested NOT_RUNNING is not a noop. NOT_RUNNING is mask
+ * of multiple flags, not a single flag.
+ */
if ((flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING) && (oflags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING))
if (!(worker->flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING))
atomic_inc(get_gcwq_nr_running(gcwq->cpu));
--
1.7.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-11 15:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-10 21:30 [merged] kernel-workqueuec-remove-noop-in-workqueue.patch removed from -mm tree akpm
[not found] ` <20110111143502.GD30607@htj.dyndns.org>
2011-01-11 15:04 ` [PATCH] workqueue: note the nested NOT_RUNNING test in worker_clr_flags() isn't a noop Tejun Heo
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.