From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] xen: events: improve event channel IRQ allocation strategy.
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:40:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110111204027.GA16286@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1294773918.12280.54.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 07:25:18PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 18:34 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >
> > > The series has been tested as:
> > > * PV guest with a PCI passthrough device.
> >
> > Which type of domain0? A 2.6.37 + Xen PCI backend + your patches?
> > Or the older 2.6.32?
>
> The 2.6.32 variant. Same for the HVM test. Dom 0 was 2.6.37 + patches.
Ok. Could you test the PV guest with a PCI passthrough device
on a PV domain 0 that is 2.6.37 based? It _should_ work
but it never hurts to try.
For your convience I've put up a merge tree with stable/* patches,
devel/irq.rework (has mine and these patches you have posted),
devel/xen-pciback, devel/gntdev (Stefano's last posting)
It is devel/next-2.6.37
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-11 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-11 17:19 [PATCH 0/4] xen: events: improve event channel IRQ allocation strategy Ian Campbell
2011-01-11 17:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] xen: handled remapped IRQs when enabling a pcifront PCI device Ian Campbell
2011-01-11 17:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] xen:events: move find_unbound_irq inside CONFIG_PCI_MSI Ian Campbell
2011-01-11 17:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] xen: events: add xen_allocate_irq_{dynamic, gsi} and xen_free_irq Ian Campbell
2011-01-11 18:46 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-11 19:32 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-03 8:30 ` [PATCH] xen: events: do not free legacy IRQs Ian Campbell
2011-02-03 9:49 ` Ian Campbell
2011-01-11 17:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] xen: events: allocate GSIs and dynamic IRQs from separate IRQ ranges Ian Campbell
2011-01-11 19:14 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-11 19:39 ` Ian Campbell
2011-01-11 18:34 ` [PATCH 0/4] xen: events: improve event channel IRQ allocation strategy Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-11 19:25 ` Ian Campbell
2011-01-11 20:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2011-01-12 10:04 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110111204027.GA16286@dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.