All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Cc: "Varadarajan, Charulatha" <charu@ti.com>,
	Linux ARM Kernel Mailing List
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] arm: omap2: clksel: fix compile warning
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:09:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110119230939.GL4957@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110117081845.GF2812@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com>

* Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> [110117 00:18]:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 01:37:41PM +0530, Varadarajan, Charulatha wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:01, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> wrote:
> > > Fix the following compile warning:
> > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/clkt_clksel.c: In function '_get_div_and_fieldval':
> > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/clkt_clksel.c:100:35: warning: 'max_clkr' may be
> > > used uninitialized in this function
> > >
> > > While at that, also add a check to avoid using max_clkr while NULL.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/clkt_clksel.c |    5 ++++-
> > >  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clkt_clksel.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clkt_clksel.c
> > > index a781cd6..baf0b6b 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clkt_clksel.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clkt_clksel.c
> > > @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static u8 _get_div_and_fieldval(struct clk *src_clk, struct clk *clk,
> > >                                u32 *field_val)
> > >  {
> > >        const struct clksel *clks;
> > > -       const struct clksel_rate *clkr, *max_clkr;
> > > +       const struct clksel_rate *clkr, *max_clkr = NULL;
> > >        u8 max_div = 0;
> > >
> > >        clks = _get_clksel_by_parent(clk, src_clk);
> > > @@ -123,6 +123,9 @@ static u8 _get_div_and_fieldval(struct clk *src_clk, struct clk *clk,
> > >                }
> > >        }
> > >
> > > +       if (!max_clkr)
> > > +               return 0;
> > 
> > Would it be more appropriate to move this check after the "if" check
> > of max_div==0 and it's warning?
> > or add a warning before it returns?
> 
> Maybe this return isn't even necessary. max_clkr will be true if max_div
> is valid, so they cancel each other.
> 
> Tony ?

Looks like the max_div test should catch it to me. Paul?

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] arm: omap2: clksel: fix compile warning
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:09:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110119230939.GL4957@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110117081845.GF2812@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com>

* Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> [110117 00:18]:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 01:37:41PM +0530, Varadarajan, Charulatha wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:01, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> wrote:
> > > Fix the following compile warning:
> > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/clkt_clksel.c: In function '_get_div_and_fieldval':
> > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/clkt_clksel.c:100:35: warning: 'max_clkr' may be
> > > used uninitialized in this function
> > >
> > > While at that, also add a check to avoid using max_clkr while NULL.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
> > > ---
> > > ?arch/arm/mach-omap2/clkt_clksel.c | ? ?5 ++++-
> > > ?1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clkt_clksel.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clkt_clksel.c
> > > index a781cd6..baf0b6b 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clkt_clksel.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clkt_clksel.c
> > > @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static u8 _get_div_and_fieldval(struct clk *src_clk, struct clk *clk,
> > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?u32 *field_val)
> > > ?{
> > > ? ? ? ?const struct clksel *clks;
> > > - ? ? ? const struct clksel_rate *clkr, *max_clkr;
> > > + ? ? ? const struct clksel_rate *clkr, *max_clkr = NULL;
> > > ? ? ? ?u8 max_div = 0;
> > >
> > > ? ? ? ?clks = _get_clksel_by_parent(clk, src_clk);
> > > @@ -123,6 +123,9 @@ static u8 _get_div_and_fieldval(struct clk *src_clk, struct clk *clk,
> > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?}
> > > ? ? ? ?}
> > >
> > > + ? ? ? if (!max_clkr)
> > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return 0;
> > 
> > Would it be more appropriate to move this check after the "if" check
> > of max_div==0 and it's warning?
> > or add a warning before it returns?
> 
> Maybe this return isn't even necessary. max_clkr will be true if max_div
> is valid, so they cancel each other.
> 
> Tony ?

Looks like the max_div test should catch it to me. Paul?

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-19 23:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-17  4:31 [PATCH 0/7] OMAP compile warning fix Felipe Balbi
2011-01-17  4:31 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-01-17  4:31 ` [PATCH 1/7] arm: omap: i2c: fix compile warning Felipe Balbi
2011-01-17  4:31   ` Felipe Balbi
2011-01-17  4:31 ` [PATCH 2/7] arm: omap1: " Felipe Balbi
2011-01-17  4:31   ` Felipe Balbi
2011-01-17  4:31 ` [PATCH 3/7] arm: omap1: fix compile warnings Felipe Balbi
2011-01-17  4:31   ` Felipe Balbi
2011-01-17  4:31 ` [PATCH 4/7] arm: omap1: fix a bunch of section mismatches Felipe Balbi
2011-01-17  4:31   ` Felipe Balbi
2011-01-17  4:31 ` [PATCH 5/7] arm: omap2: mux: fix compile warning Felipe Balbi
2011-01-17  4:31   ` Felipe Balbi
2011-01-17  4:31 ` [PATCH 6/7] arm: omap2: irq: fix compile warning: Felipe Balbi
2011-01-17  4:31   ` Felipe Balbi
2011-01-17  4:31 ` [PATCH 7/7] arm: omap2: clksel: fix compile warning Felipe Balbi
2011-01-17  4:31   ` Felipe Balbi
2011-01-17  8:07   ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-01-17  8:07     ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2011-01-17  8:18     ` Felipe Balbi
2011-01-17  8:18       ` Felipe Balbi
2011-01-19 23:09       ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2011-01-19 23:09         ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-20  1:25 ` [PATCH 0/7] OMAP compile warning fix Tony Lindgren
2011-01-20  1:25   ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110119230939.GL4957@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=charu@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.