From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] pci: w1cmask[PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL] initialized incorrectly
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:46:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110126134601.GE12805@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110126131748.GA4395@valinux.co.jp>
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:17:48PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> The bit should be writable, not w1c.
>
> 3.2.5.18 bridge control register
> bit 11 Discard Timer SERR# Enable
>
> When set to 1, this bit enables the bridge to assert SERR# on
> the primary interface when either the Primary Discard Timer or
> Secondary Discard Timer expires and a Delayed Transaction is
> discarded from a queue in the bridge. The default state of this
> bit must be 0 after reset.
> 0 - do not assert SERR# on the primary interface as
> a result of the expiration of either the Primary
> Discard Timer or Secondary Discard Timer
> 1 - assert SERR# on the primary interface if either
> the Primary Discard Timer or Secondary Discard
> Timer expires and a Delayed Transaction
Yes but
#define PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_DISCARD_STATUS 0x400 /* Discard timer status */
So this is bit 10?
BTW, how about moving these bits to linux and then to our pci_regs.h?
>S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 06:45:27PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > > pci_init_wmask_bridge() incorrectly set w1cmask[PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL].
> > > This patch removes the line otherwise the assert(!(wmask & w1cmask)) in
> > > pci_default_write_config() is hit.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
> >
> > Maybe clear in wmask? This bit really should be w1c, should it not?
> >
> > > ---
> > > hw/pci.c | 4 ----
> > > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/pci.c b/hw/pci.c
> > > index b8f5385..79a46e7 100644
> > > --- a/hw/pci.c
> > > +++ b/hw/pci.c
> > > @@ -643,10 +643,6 @@ static void pci_init_wmask_bridge(PCIDevice *d)
> > > PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SEC_DISCARD |
> > > PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_DISCARD_STATUS |
> > > PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_DISCARD_SERR);
> > > - /* Below does not do anything as we never set this bit, put here for
> > > - * completeness. */
> > > - pci_set_word(d->w1cmask + PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL,
> > > - PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_DISCARD_STATUS);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int pci_init_multifunction(PCIBus *bus, PCIDevice *dev)
> > > --
> > > 1.7.1.1
> >
>
> --
> yamahata
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-26 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-26 9:45 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: w1cmask[PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL] initialized incorrectly Isaku Yamahata
2011-01-26 12:09 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-26 13:17 ` Isaku Yamahata
2011-01-26 13:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2011-01-26 13:53 ` Isaku Yamahata
2011-01-26 13:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-27 3:54 ` Isaku Yamahata
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110126134601.GE12805@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yamahata@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.