From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] pci: w1cmask[PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL] initialized incorrectly
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:57:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110126135715.GB13219@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110126135342.GB4395@valinux.co.jp>
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:53:42PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 03:46:01PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:17:48PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > > The bit should be writable, not w1c.
> > >
> > > 3.2.5.18 bridge control register
> > > bit 11 Discard Timer SERR# Enable
> > >
> > > When set to 1, this bit enables the bridge to assert SERR# on
> > > the primary interface when either the Primary Discard Timer or
> > > Secondary Discard Timer expires and a Delayed Transaction is
> > > discarded from a queue in the bridge. The default state of this
> > > bit must be 0 after reset.
> > > 0 - do not assert SERR# on the primary interface as
> > > a result of the expiration of either the Primary
> > > Discard Timer or Secondary Discard Timer
> > > 1 - assert SERR# on the primary interface if either
> > > the Primary Discard Timer or Secondary Discard
> > > Timer expires and a Delayed Transaction
> >
> > Yes but
> > #define PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_DISCARD_STATUS 0x400 /* Discard timer status */
> >
> > So this is bit 10?
>
> Oh, sorry. So wmask should be chenged.
Yes. does the below work?
commit 24ebb78e6ec19b39cd138d493a2859122110f9cb
Author: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Jan 26 15:55:07 2011 +0200
pci: bridge control fixup
PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_DISCARD_STATUS (bit 10 in bridge control register)
is W1C so we should not make it writeable, otherwise the assert(!(wmask
& w1cmask)) in pci_default_write_config() is hit
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
diff --git a/hw/pci.c b/hw/pci.c
index 044c4bd..712280a 100644
--- a/hw/pci.c
+++ b/hw/pci.c
@@ -641,7 +641,6 @@ static void pci_init_wmask_bridge(PCIDevice *d)
PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_FAST_BACK |
PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_DISCARD |
PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SEC_DISCARD |
- PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_DISCARD_STATUS |
PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_DISCARD_SERR);
/* Below does not do anything as we never set this bit, put here for
* completeness. */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-26 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-26 9:45 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: w1cmask[PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL] initialized incorrectly Isaku Yamahata
2011-01-26 12:09 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-26 13:17 ` Isaku Yamahata
2011-01-26 13:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-26 13:53 ` Isaku Yamahata
2011-01-26 13:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2011-01-27 3:54 ` Isaku Yamahata
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110126135715.GB13219@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yamahata@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.