* AUDIT SYSCALL kernel configuration option on ARM ? @ 2011-01-27 12:19 Laszlo Papp 2011-01-27 13:53 ` Steve Grubb 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Laszlo Papp @ 2011-01-27 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-audit Hi, I have just faced into this issue weeks ago. This is the related thread: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?p=4231159#post4231159 Any 2 cents on the matter or plan, schedule when to fix it ? Best Regards, Laszlo Papp ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: AUDIT SYSCALL kernel configuration option on ARM ? 2011-01-27 12:19 AUDIT SYSCALL kernel configuration option on ARM ? Laszlo Papp @ 2011-01-27 13:53 ` Steve Grubb 2011-01-28 12:46 ` Laszlo Papp 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Steve Grubb @ 2011-01-27 13:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-audit On Thursday, January 27, 2011 07:19:16 am Laszlo Papp wrote: > I have just faced into this issue weeks ago. > This is the related thread: > http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?p=4231159#post423115 > 9 > > Any 2 cents on the matter or plan, schedule when to fix it ? I added user space support quite a while back and asked for kernel help. No one answered: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/arm/2009-October/000382.html If no one wants to help, then I have to wait until someone finally decides to fix it. -Steve ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: AUDIT SYSCALL kernel configuration option on ARM ? 2011-01-27 13:53 ` Steve Grubb @ 2011-01-28 12:46 ` Laszlo Papp 2011-01-28 13:25 ` Steve Grubb 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Laszlo Papp @ 2011-01-28 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Steve Grubb; +Cc: linux-audit On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thursday, January 27, 2011 07:19:16 am Laszlo Papp wrote: >> I have just faced into this issue weeks ago. >> This is the related thread: >> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?p=4231159#post423115 >> 9 >> >> Any 2 cents on the matter or plan, schedule when to fix it ? > > I added user space support quite a while back and asked for kernel help. No one > answered: > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/arm/2009-October/000382.html > > If no one wants to help, then I have to wait until someone finally decides to fix it. > > -Steve I see, Steve. Unfortunately I cannot help because I do not have too much kernel programming experience. The real problem why I wanted to give a glimpse for AUDIT because upstart cannot print out the process ID information about the commands that were run from the pre/post-start/stop section of the /etc/init/*.conf upstart config/job files. I has been told so that audit could be used in this special case for my purpose. The first question is that whether or not kernel's audit-properties can be used without the SYSCALL configuration option - so basically just with the "default one" - to get more accurate information about the processes upstart launches during the boot-up. Thank you in advance! Best Regards, Laszlo Papp ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: AUDIT SYSCALL kernel configuration option on ARM ? 2011-01-28 12:46 ` Laszlo Papp @ 2011-01-28 13:25 ` Steve Grubb 2011-01-28 14:19 ` Laszlo Papp 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Steve Grubb @ 2011-01-28 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Laszlo Papp; +Cc: linux-audit On Friday, January 28, 2011 07:46:13 am Laszlo Papp wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com> wrote: > > If no one wants to help, then I have to wait until someone finally > > decides to fix it. > > I see, Steve. Unfortunately I cannot help because I do not have too > much kernel programming experience. The real problem why I wanted to > give a glimpse for AUDIT because upstart cannot print out the process > ID information about the commands that were run from the > pre/post-start/stop section of the /etc/init/*.conf upstart config/job > files. I suspect you could patch upstart to record this information. Where to put it is the main question since the only thing that might be accesible is /. > I has been told so that audit could be used in this special case for > my purpose. The first question is that whether or not kernel's > audit-properties can be used without the SYSCALL configuration option > - so basically just with the "default one" - to get more accurate > information about the processes upstart launches during the boot-up. Not really. You would have to patch upstart to send audit events. But assuming you had support for this on ARM processors, the audit system has a start priority of 11 using the old SysVinit style of startup. If you use LSB style startups, then you will find more disappointing news because my calls for an audit facility have also went unanswered. They have a syslog facility, but no one seems to care about audit. So, whenever the audit system finally starts up, you could use a rule like this: -a always,exit -S execve -F ppid=1 -k init and you can use the key, init, for searching ausearch --start today -k init There is a readahead collector that could probably be hacked to record process information rather than file loading information. The following location has some info and links on profiling startup: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/30SecondStartup/ReadAheadReloaded -Steve ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: AUDIT SYSCALL kernel configuration option on ARM ? 2011-01-28 13:25 ` Steve Grubb @ 2011-01-28 14:19 ` Laszlo Papp 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Laszlo Papp @ 2011-01-28 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Steve Grubb; +Cc: linux-audit On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com> wrote: > On Friday, January 28, 2011 07:46:13 am Laszlo Papp wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com> wrote: >> > If no one wants to help, then I have to wait until someone finally >> > decides to fix it. >> >> I see, Steve. Unfortunately I cannot help because I do not have too >> much kernel programming experience. The real problem why I wanted to >> give a glimpse for AUDIT because upstart cannot print out the process >> ID information about the commands that were run from the >> pre/post-start/stop section of the /etc/init/*.conf upstart config/job >> files. > > I suspect you could patch upstart to record this information. Where to put it is the > main question since the only thing that might be accesible is /. What is wrong about '/' then ? >> I has been told so that audit could be used in this special case for >> my purpose. The first question is that whether or not kernel's >> audit-properties can be used without the SYSCALL configuration option >> - so basically just with the "default one" - to get more accurate >> information about the processes upstart launches during the boot-up. > > Not really. You would have to patch upstart to send audit events. But assuming you had > support for this on ARM processors, the audit system has a start priority of 11 using > the old SysVinit style of startup. If you use LSB style startups, then you will find > more disappointing news because my calls for an audit facility have also went > unanswered. They have a syslog facility, but no one seems to care about audit. So, > whenever the audit system finally starts up, you could use a rule like this: > > -a always,exit -S execve -F ppid=1 -k init > > and you can use the key, init, for searching > > ausearch --start today -k init > > There is a readahead collector that could probably be hacked to record process > information rather than file loading information. The following location has some info > and links on profiling startup: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/30SecondStartup/ReadAheadReloaded Let me summarize how I realized this post of yours and do not hesitate to slap me if I am mistaken :) : There is no current support for ARM processor and LSB style initscripts and the prospect is rather poor due to your past experience. (about asking help) On the top of the previous problematic statement, situation I should write an upstart patch to support audit, anyway. It does not sound too perspective :/. Do you think that I can avoid the audit usage and patch upstart with a sysvinit-like bootlogd functionaility ? (http://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/viewvc/sysvinit/trunk/src/bootlogd.c?root=sysvinit&view=markup). After this discussion the upstart extension seems the most reasonable way to do it (the only viable though). Thank you in advance! Best Regards, Laszlo Papp ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-28 14:19 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-01-27 12:19 AUDIT SYSCALL kernel configuration option on ARM ? Laszlo Papp 2011-01-27 13:53 ` Steve Grubb 2011-01-28 12:46 ` Laszlo Papp 2011-01-28 13:25 ` Steve Grubb 2011-01-28 14:19 ` Laszlo Papp
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.