From: Nico Schottelius <nico-kernel-20110117-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Kernel Testers List
<kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Maciej Rutecki
<maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Florian Mickler <florian-sVu6HhrpSfRAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
Nico Schottelius
<nico-kernel-20110117-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #28102] New display errors in 2.6.38-rc2-00175-g6fb1b30
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 19:55:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110203185516.GA2560@schottelius.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110203101111.35d71bf0@jbarnes-desktop>
Chris Wilson <chris-Y6uKTt2uX1cEflXRtASbqLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>:
> This should hopefully find the culprit:
> $ git bisect start drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> $ git bisect good v2.6.37
> $ git bisect bad
Just went that path, compiled 2.6.37-rc4-00292-g3c8cdf9
and suspended which resulted in a completly dead device
(no ping, no ctrlaltdel possible), i.e. different fatal situation.
I'm a bit confused, not sure whether this is related to
the broken display issue or not.
As the tests always cost a quite lengthy fsck run, I'd
love to go a different way from 2.6.37, if anybody has
a better hint.
Cheers,
Nico
--
PGP key: 7ED9 F7D3 6B10 81D7 0EC5 5C09 D7DC C8E4 3187 7DF0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nico Schottelius <nico-kernel-20110117@schottelius.org>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>,
Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>,
Nico Schottelius <nico-kernel-20110117@schottelius.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #28102] New display errors in 2.6.38-rc2-00175-g6fb1b30
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 19:55:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110203185516.GA2560@schottelius.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110203101111.35d71bf0@jbarnes-desktop>
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>:
> This should hopefully find the culprit:
> $ git bisect start drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> $ git bisect good v2.6.37
> $ git bisect bad
Just went that path, compiled 2.6.37-rc4-00292-g3c8cdf9
and suspended which resulted in a completly dead device
(no ping, no ctrlaltdel possible), i.e. different fatal situation.
I'm a bit confused, not sure whether this is related to
the broken display issue or not.
As the tests always cost a quite lengthy fsck run, I'd
love to go a different way from 2.6.37, if anybody has
a better hint.
Cheers,
Nico
--
PGP key: 7ED9 F7D3 6B10 81D7 0EC5 5C09 D7DC C8E4 3187 7DF0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-03 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-02 23:02 2.6.38-rc3-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.37 Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-02 23:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-02 23:02 ` [Bug #27022] [REPORT] BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#0, init/1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-02 23:31 ` [Bug #27652] 38-rc1: umount+rmmod cause ext4 error Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-02 23:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-02 23:31 ` [Bug #27282] Regression: 2.6.38 vs. Powertop 2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-02 23:31 ` [Bug #27472] 5bd5a45 breaks resume from suspend on Thinkpad X201 Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-02 23:31 ` [Bug #27702] regression 2.6.37 -> 2.6.38-rc1: after suspend backlight cannot be adjusted Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-02 23:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-02 23:31 ` [Bug #27382] ath5k phy0: gain calibration timeout Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-02 23:31 ` [Bug #27812] 2.6.38-rc2: acpi backlight control missing Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-02 23:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-10 2:08 ` Zhang Rui
2011-02-10 2:08 ` Zhang Rui
2011-02-02 23:31 ` [Bug #27862] Cannot launch X.org server on Core I5 with 2.6.38-rc2-git7 Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-02 23:31 ` [Bug #28012] [drm:i915_driver_load] *ERROR* failed to init modeset, EINVAL Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-02 23:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-02 23:31 ` [Bug #28102] New display errors in 2.6.38-rc2-00175-g6fb1b30 Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-03 18:11 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-02-03 18:11 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-02-03 18:44 ` Nico Schottelius
[not found] ` <20110203184412.GA3956-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-03 18:53 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-02-03 18:53 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-02-03 18:55 ` Nico Schottelius [this message]
2011-02-03 18:55 ` Nico Schottelius
2011-02-02 23:31 ` [Bug #28052] [BUG] 2.6.38-rc2: Circular Locking Dependency Rafael J. Wysocki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-02-12 22:57 2.6.38-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.37 Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-12 23:05 ` [Bug #28102] New display errors in 2.6.38-rc2-00175-g6fb1b30 Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-12 23:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-21 21:52 2.6.38-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.37 Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-21 22:02 ` [Bug #28102] New display errors in 2.6.38-rc2-00175-g6fb1b30 Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-21 22:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-06 12:08 2.6.38-rc7-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.37 Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-06 12:10 ` [Bug #28102] New display errors in 2.6.38-rc2-00175-g6fb1b30 Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-27 20:01 2.6.38-git18: Reported regressions from 2.6.37 Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-27 20:01 ` [Bug #28102] New display errors in 2.6.38-rc2-00175-g6fb1b30 Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-27 20:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-04 10:50 ` Nico Schottelius
2011-04-04 10:50 ` Nico Schottelius
[not found] ` <20110404105014.GA581-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
2011-04-05 6:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-05 6:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110203185516.GA2560@schottelius.org \
--to=nico-kernel-20110117-xuavfqxs+5hig4jrrz66wa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=florian-sVu6HhrpSfRAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.