From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/20] ata_piix: add new PIIX_FLAG_* flags
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 10:10:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201102091010.24914.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D518BBC.8050904@ru.mvista.com>
Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> >>> Turn open-coded checks in piix_set_timings() into PIIX_FLAG_* flags
> >>> per suggestion from Alan Cox.
> >>> Suggested-by: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> >> [...]
>
> >>> Index: b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
> >>> ===================================================================
> >>> --- a/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
> >>> @@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ enum {
> >>> PIIX_FLAG_CHECKINTR = (1 << 28), /* make sure PCI INTx enabled
> >>> */
> >>> PIIX_FLAG_SIDPR = (1 << 29), /* SATA idx/data pair regs */
> >>> + PIIX_FLAG_NO_SITRE = (1 << 30), /* no SITRE register */
>
> >> The register in question is called SIDETIM, SITRE is a bit that enables
> >> its use.
>
> > ICH4-M databook that I have at hand (Intel IDE PRM seems to be gone
> > from Intel's website, though I'm sure I have a backup _somewhere_) it
> > is called SLV_IDETIM so lets just stick with the current naming for
> > now..
>
> Why not just say that SITRE is a bit, not register? :-)
Good point.. :-)
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 21/20] ata_piix: add new PIIX_FLAG_* flags
Turn open-coded checks in piix_set_timings() into PIIX_FLAG_* flags
per suggestion from Alan Cox.
Suggested-by: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
---
On top of https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/8/97 patchset.
v2: s/SITRE register/SITRE bit/ per Sergei's comment
drivers/ata/ata_piix.c | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Index: b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
@@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ enum {
PIIX_FLAG_CHECKINTR = (1 << 28), /* make sure PCI INTx enabled */
PIIX_FLAG_SIDPR = (1 << 29), /* SATA idx/data pair regs */
+ PIIX_FLAG_NO_SITRE = (1 << 30), /* no SITRE bit */
+ PIIX_FLAG_RADISYS = (1 << 31), /* host is Radisys R82600 */
PIIX_PATA_FLAGS = ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS,
PIIX_SATA_FLAGS = ATA_FLAG_SATA | PIIX_FLAG_CHECKINTR,
@@ -698,7 +700,7 @@ static struct ata_port_info piix_port_in
[oldpiix_pata] =
{
- .flags = PIIX_PATA_FLAGS,
+ .flags = PIIX_PATA_FLAGS | PIIX_FLAG_NO_SITRE,
.pio_mask = ATA_PIO4,
.mwdma_mask = ATA_MWDMA12_ONLY,
.port_ops = &oldpiix_pata_ops,
@@ -706,7 +708,8 @@ static struct ata_port_info piix_port_in
[radisys_pata] =
{
- .flags = PIIX_PATA_FLAGS,
+ .flags = PIIX_PATA_FLAGS | PIIX_FLAG_NO_SITRE |
+ PIIX_FLAG_RADISYS,
.pio_mask = ATA_PIO4,
.mwdma_mask = ATA_MWDMA12_ONLY,
.udma_mask = ATA_UDMA24_ONLY,
@@ -859,10 +862,8 @@ static void piix_set_timings(struct ata_
struct pci_dev *dev = to_pci_dev(ap->host->dev);
unsigned long flags;
unsigned int is_slave = (adev->devno != 0);
- unsigned int is_radisys = (dev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_RADISYS &&
- dev->device == 0x8201);
- unsigned int has_sitre = (dev->vendor != PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL ||
- dev->device != 0x1230) && !is_radisys;
+ unsigned int is_radisys = (ap->flags & PIIX_FLAG_RADISYS) ? 1 : 0;
+ unsigned int has_sitre = (ap->flags & PIIX_FLAG_NO_SITRE) ? 0 : 1;
unsigned int master_port= ap->port_no ? 0x42 : 0x40;
unsigned int slave_port = 0x44;
u16 master_data;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-09 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-08 15:52 [PATCH 21/20] ata_piix: add new PIIX_FLAG_* flags Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2011-02-08 16:03 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2011-02-08 17:12 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-02-08 18:18 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2011-02-08 18:30 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-02-09 9:10 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2011-02-11 13:04 ` Sergei Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201102091010.24914.bzolnier@gmail.com \
--to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sshtylyov@mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.