From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: "Ramirez Luna, Omar" <omar.ramirez@ti.com>
Cc: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
lo <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
lak <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] OMAP4: hwmod data: add mailbox data
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:39:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110217233908.GG20795@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=yj2_bS1h87u0hhUUpA=RPZe-A=PiNSf_q_66r@mail.gmail.com>
* Ramirez Luna, Omar <omar.ramirez@ti.com> [110215 16:11]:
>
> > If you have to do several platform_get_irq_byname to get this one, I'd
> > prefer to get rid of that name for OMAP4. It will make mailbox irq
> > consistent with the other hwmods.
>
> I was thinking to standardize the names to be mbox0..mboxN across all
> the platforms, reason being that the mailbox also has capabilities to
> be used not only by dsp or iva, by using a polling method.
>
> So even if the mailbox in OMAP3 is called "dsp", it has 4 more queues
> apart from the 2 used for messaging between arm and dsp, that could be
> used even if tidspbridge wasn't there.
So what's the status of this series? Can the rest of the patches
now be applied on top of the current omap-for-linus or do the names
still need fixing?
Tony
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/5] OMAP4: hwmod data: add mailbox data
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:39:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110217233908.GG20795@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=yj2_bS1h87u0hhUUpA=RPZe-A=PiNSf_q_66r@mail.gmail.com>
* Ramirez Luna, Omar <omar.ramirez@ti.com> [110215 16:11]:
>
> > If you have to do several platform_get_irq_byname to get this one, I'd
> > prefer to get rid of that name for OMAP4. It will make mailbox irq
> > consistent with the other hwmods.
>
> I was thinking to standardize the names to be mbox0..mboxN across all
> the platforms, reason being that the mailbox also has capabilities to
> be used not only by dsp or iva, by using a polling method.
>
> So even if the mailbox in OMAP3 is called "dsp", it has 4 more queues
> apart from the 2 used for messaging between arm and dsp, that could be
> used even if tidspbridge wasn't there.
So what's the status of this series? Can the rest of the patches
now be applied on top of the current omap-for-linus or do the names
still need fixing?
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-17 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-02 19:27 [PATCH v5 0/5] omap: mailbox: hwmod support Omar Ramirez Luna
2011-02-02 19:27 ` Omar Ramirez Luna
2011-02-02 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] OMAP2: hwmod data: add mailbox data Omar Ramirez Luna
2011-02-02 19:27 ` Omar Ramirez Luna
2011-02-02 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] OMAP3: " Omar Ramirez Luna
2011-02-02 19:27 ` Omar Ramirez Luna
2011-02-02 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] OMAP4: " Omar Ramirez Luna
2011-02-02 19:27 ` Omar Ramirez Luna
2011-02-14 15:00 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-02-14 15:00 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-02-15 21:55 ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2011-02-15 21:55 ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2011-02-15 22:05 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-02-15 22:05 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-02-16 0:13 ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2011-02-16 0:13 ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2011-02-17 23:39 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2011-02-17 23:39 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-18 0:24 ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2011-02-18 0:24 ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2011-02-02 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] OMAP: mailbox: build device using omap_device/omap_hwmod Omar Ramirez Luna
2011-02-02 19:27 ` Omar Ramirez Luna
2011-02-02 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] OMAP: mailbox: use runtime pm for clk and sysc handling Omar Ramirez Luna
2011-02-02 19:27 ` Omar Ramirez Luna
2011-02-08 23:44 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] omap: mailbox: hwmod support Kevin Hilman
2011-02-08 23:44 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-02-09 18:32 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-09 18:32 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-10 6:01 ` Hiroshi DOYU
2011-02-10 6:01 ` Hiroshi DOYU
2011-02-11 16:37 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-02-11 16:37 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-02-10 5:34 ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-02-10 5:34 ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-02-10 21:12 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-02-10 21:12 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-02-11 23:01 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-02-11 23:01 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-02-15 20:56 ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2011-02-15 20:56 ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110217233908.GG20795@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=omar.ramirez@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.