Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] ftrace: Use -mfentry when supported (this is for x86_64 right now)

[Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>]

[Adding Dominique Toupin, from Ericsson, to CC list]

* Steven Rostedt (rostedt@goodmis.org) wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 20:45 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > (2011/02/18 5:11), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 01:07 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > 
> > >> I just thought that frequent stop-machine is not so good from the user's
> > >> POV. I agree that disabled probe ignoring the call is enough.
> > >> Maybe, it could be done with the similar mechanism of jump optimization.
> > > 
> > > I thought jump optimization still calls stop_machine too?
> > 
> > Yes, but now it does batch optimization.
> > Even if hundreds kprobes are registered separately, jump optimization
> > has been done in background with a stop_machine per every 256 probes.
> > (Until optimizing, kprobes can use breakpoints instead)
> 
> But a single optimized kprobe still must use stopmachine.
> 
> But it is true that the function tracer does it as one big shot. That
> is, it will do all functions in a single stop machine that needs to be
> changed. It too is batched, but there is not a limit to that batch.
> 
> I would be interested in hearing from users and real use cases that
> someone would like to trace functions but stopmachine is too big of a
> hammer.

Hi Steven,

Telecom end users are one of such cases where the latency induced by stop
machine while the system is running is a problem. Dominique Toupin could
certainly tell us more about Ericsson's use-cases.

Thanks,

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com