From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Dominique Toupin <dominique.toupin@ericsson.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"2nddept-manager@sdl.hitachi.co.jp"
<2nddept-manager@sdl.hitachi.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] ftrace: Use -mfentry when supported (this is for x86_64 right now)
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 14:07:24 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D5F500C.40509@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1298070174.23343.987.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
(2011/02/19 8:02), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 14:45 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
>> We should also be able to use the breakpoint hack to avoid holding all
>> the CPUs. They still need to be interrupted, but that skips the
>> rendezvous operation.
That's what I've done with text_poke_fixup()
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/18/312
And I think it still not be checked officially from silicon side.
> As this is about the ftrace code, I'm in the process of analyzing and
> updating how the function tracer works. I can look to see if I can
> design it so we don't have to always use stop_machine() if a breakpoint
> method is in place.
>
> Basically what is needed is to convert a "nop" into a "call" or maybe
> the other way around, safely.
>
> Now is it safe to insert a breakpoint (usually a byte I believe), modify
> the rest of the instruction and then replace the breakpoint to the new
> code? Since the instruction that is being replaced or the instruction
> being added is always a nop, the breakpoint handler needs to do nothing
> but return to the location after the nop/call.
Yes, at least with text_poke_fixup(), you can call it as below
text_poke_fixup(addr, call_insn, CALL_INSN_SIZE, addr + CALL_INSN_SIZE);
Then, if a processor hits the addr, the breakpoint handler changes its
regs->ip to addr + CALL_INSN_SIZE so that it skips the modifying
instruction.
> Is there any synchronization that needs to be done when doing this? Or
> can it just be:
>
> insert_breakpoint();
> update_instruction();
> remove_breakpoint();
>
> Because we need to do this for 22,000 calls in a row.
In the case of text_poke_fixup(), it sends IPI twice for synchronization,
which doesn't stop all cores but current core. Of course, theoretically
this can be reduced by doing it in a batch.
Thank you,
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
2nd Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Systems Development Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-19 5:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-09 20:02 [RFC][PATCH 0/4] ftrace: Use -mfentry when supported (this is for x86_64 right now) Steven Rostedt
2011-02-09 20:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] ftrace: Make recordmcount.c handle __fentry__ Steven Rostedt
2011-02-09 20:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] ftrace: Add -mfentry to Makefile on function tracer Steven Rostedt
2011-02-09 20:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-09 21:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-09 20:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] ftrace: Do not test frame pointers if -mfentry is used Steven Rostedt
2011-02-09 20:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] ftrace/x86: Add support for -mfentry to x86_64 Steven Rostedt
2011-02-10 2:38 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4] ftrace: Use -mfentry when supported (this is for x86_64 right now) Masami Hiramatsu
2011-02-17 12:37 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-02-17 13:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-17 15:34 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-02-17 15:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-17 16:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-02-17 20:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-18 11:45 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-02-18 15:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-18 15:19 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-02-18 20:10 ` Dominique Toupin
2011-02-18 20:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-18 21:45 ` Dominique Toupin
2011-02-18 22:39 ` Andi Kleen
2011-02-18 22:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-18 23:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-02-19 5:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2011-02-19 5:10 ` hpas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D5F500C.40509@hitachi.com \
--to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=2nddept-manager@sdl.hitachi.co.jp \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dominique.toupin@ericsson.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.