* clustered snapshots status, LVM on shared storage without CLVM?
@ 2011-02-28 21:28 Nikola Ciprich
2011-02-28 21:49 ` Jonathan Brassow
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nikola Ciprich @ 2011-02-28 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dm-devel; +Cc: nikola.ciprich
Hello,
I'd like to ask, what is the current status of cluster locking patches?
I'm especially interested in clustered snapshots, is there some
estimate on when I could be suitable for testing and possibly
closer to production?
I'd like to use DMLoop on my clustered storage (as well as snapshots
in general), but with CLVM it's not really possible.
If the time is not close yet, my second question is - is it
dangerous to use LVM on top of shared storage without using CLVM?
If I'll take care to not run lvm commands from more then one node?
I'll be gratefull for any reply from more more experienced users
in this area.
thanks a lot in advance!
with best regards
nik
--
-------------------------------------
Ing. Nikola CIPRICH
LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o.
28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava
tel.: +420 596 603 142
fax: +420 596 621 273
mobil: +420 777 093 799
www.linuxbox.cz
mobil servis: +420 737 238 656
email servis: servis@linuxbox.cz
-------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: clustered snapshots status, LVM on shared storage without CLVM?
2011-02-28 21:28 clustered snapshots status, LVM on shared storage without CLVM? Nikola Ciprich
@ 2011-02-28 21:49 ` Jonathan Brassow
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Brassow @ 2011-02-28 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: device-mapper development
A true active/active cluster snapshot is not currently planned. There
is some discussion from time to time about whether it is appropriate
or not, but even this is idle chatter until the new (single-machine)
shared snapshot implementation is completed.
However, you will be able to take snapshots in a cluster in the next
RHEL releases (or if you use upstream sources) if the volume you are
snapshotting is activated exclusively.
It is possible to use LVM in a cluster without CLVM. I don't think it
would be smart though. You are essentially trying to do clvmd's job.
Do you know everything that it does? Are you sure you won't ever make
a mistake?
brassow
On Feb 28, 2011, at 3:28 PM, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
> Hello,
> I'd like to ask, what is the current status of cluster locking
> patches?
> I'm especially interested in clustered snapshots, is there some
> estimate on when I could be suitable for testing and possibly
> closer to production?
> I'd like to use DMLoop on my clustered storage (as well as snapshots
> in general), but with CLVM it's not really possible.
> If the time is not close yet, my second question is - is it
> dangerous to use LVM on top of shared storage without using CLVM?
> If I'll take care to not run lvm commands from more then one node?
> I'll be gratefull for any reply from more more experienced users
> in this area.
> thanks a lot in advance!
> with best regards
> nik
>
>
> --
> -------------------------------------
> Ing. Nikola CIPRICH
> LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o.
> 28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava
>
> tel.: +420 596 603 142
> fax: +420 596 621 273
> mobil: +420 777 093 799
>
> www.linuxbox.cz
>
> mobil servis: +420 737 238 656
> email servis: servis@linuxbox.cz
> -------------------------------------
>
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-28 21:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-28 21:28 clustered snapshots status, LVM on shared storage without CLVM? Nikola Ciprich
2011-02-28 21:49 ` Jonathan Brassow
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.