From: "Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe" <Mario.Holbe@TU-Ilmenau.DE>
To: dm-crypt@saout.de
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com>
Subject: [dm-crypt] dm-crypt: Performance Regression 2.6.37 -> 2.6.38-rc8
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 17:45:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110308164508.GA8729@darkside.kls.lan> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1268 bytes --]
Hello,
dm-crypt in 2.6.38 changed to per-CPU workqueues to increase it's
performance by parallelizing encryption to multiple CPUs.
This modification seems to cause (massive) performance drops for
multiple parallel dm-crypt instances...
I'm running a 4-disk RAID0 on top of 4 independent dm-crypt(aes-xts)
devices on a Core2Quad 3GHz. This setup did overcome the single-CPU
limitation from previous versions and utilized all 4 cores for
encryption.
The throughput of this array drops from 282MB/s sustained read (dd,
single process) with 2.6.37.3 down to 133MB/s with 2.6.38-rc8 (which
nearly equals to single-disk throughput of 128MB/s - just in case this
matters).
This indicates way less parallelization now with 2.6.38 than before.
I don't think this was intentional :)
The dm-crypt per-CPU workqueues got introduced in 2.6.38 with
c029772125594e31eb1a5ad9e0913724ed9891f2
Reverting dm-crypt.c to the version before this commit re-gains the same
throughput as with 2.6.37.
Submitters/Signers of c029772125594e31eb1a5ad9e0913724ed9891f2 CC:ed.
Thanks for your work & regards
Mario
--
There are two major products that come from Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
We don't believe this to be a coincidence. -- Jeremy S. Anderson
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 482 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe" <Mario.Holbe@TU-Ilmenau.DE>
To: dm-crypt@saout.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com>, Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: dm-crypt: Performance Regression 2.6.37 -> 2.6.38-rc8
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 17:45:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110308164508.GA8729@darkside.kls.lan> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1268 bytes --]
Hello,
dm-crypt in 2.6.38 changed to per-CPU workqueues to increase it's
performance by parallelizing encryption to multiple CPUs.
This modification seems to cause (massive) performance drops for
multiple parallel dm-crypt instances...
I'm running a 4-disk RAID0 on top of 4 independent dm-crypt(aes-xts)
devices on a Core2Quad 3GHz. This setup did overcome the single-CPU
limitation from previous versions and utilized all 4 cores for
encryption.
The throughput of this array drops from 282MB/s sustained read (dd,
single process) with 2.6.37.3 down to 133MB/s with 2.6.38-rc8 (which
nearly equals to single-disk throughput of 128MB/s - just in case this
matters).
This indicates way less parallelization now with 2.6.38 than before.
I don't think this was intentional :)
The dm-crypt per-CPU workqueues got introduced in 2.6.38 with
c029772125594e31eb1a5ad9e0913724ed9891f2
Reverting dm-crypt.c to the version before this commit re-gains the same
throughput as with 2.6.37.
Submitters/Signers of c029772125594e31eb1a5ad9e0913724ed9891f2 CC:ed.
Thanks for your work & regards
Mario
--
There are two major products that come from Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
We don't believe this to be a coincidence. -- Jeremy S. Anderson
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 482 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2011-03-08 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-08 16:45 Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe [this message]
2011-03-08 16:45 ` dm-crypt: Performance Regression 2.6.37 -> 2.6.38-rc8 Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2011-03-08 17:35 ` [dm-crypt] " Milan Broz
2011-03-08 19:23 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2011-03-08 19:23 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2011-03-08 20:07 ` Milan Broz
2011-03-08 20:17 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2011-03-08 20:17 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2011-03-09 16:58 ` Heinz Diehl
2011-03-10 16:57 ` Andi Kleen
2011-03-10 16:57 ` Andi Kleen
2011-03-10 17:54 ` [dm-crypt] " Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2011-03-10 17:54 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2011-03-11 1:18 ` [dm-crypt] " Andi Kleen
2011-03-11 1:18 ` Andi Kleen
2011-03-11 18:03 ` [dm-crypt] " Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2011-03-11 18:03 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2011-03-11 18:29 ` [dm-crypt] " Milan Broz
2011-03-11 18:29 ` Milan Broz
2011-03-11 18:36 ` [dm-crypt] " Andi Kleen
2011-03-11 18:36 ` Andi Kleen
2011-03-12 1:05 ` [dm-crypt] " Herbert Xu
2011-03-12 1:05 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110308164508.GA8729@darkside.kls.lan \
--to=mario.holbe@tu-ilmenau.de \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dm-crypt@saout.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbroz@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.