* is git.kernel.org the best place for stable releases ?
@ 2011-03-16 19:47 Jim Cromie
2011-03-16 19:53 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jim Cromie @ 2011-03-16 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
OpenWrt is apparently using a stable release that isnt on kernel.org
Bartman007 wrote:
23 November 2010
The OpenWrt Release Team would like to announce a fourth release
candidate (RC4) for Backfire Interim Release 1 (10.03.1). Testing of
this release candidate will allow further refinement of 10.03.1
* 2.6.32 targets updated from 2.6.32.16 to 2.6.32.25
OpenWrt 10.03 is running 2.6.32.10, which is still ahead of kernel.org
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/smb/smb-2.6.32.y.git;a=commit;h=7f5e918e62cbc9ac27c2f47d3c3dd4b86f67ff0e
2010-02-23 Greg Kroah... Linux 2.6.32.9 master origin/HEAD
origin/master v2.6.32.9
stefan.bader at canonical.com is the branch/tree owner, ccd,
FYI to kernelnewbies.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* is git.kernel.org the best place for stable releases ?
2011-03-16 19:47 is git.kernel.org the best place for stable releases ? Jim Cromie
@ 2011-03-16 19:53 ` Greg KH
2011-03-16 20:39 ` Jim Cromie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2011-03-16 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 01:47:28PM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
> OpenWrt is apparently using a stable release that isnt on kernel.org
>
> Bartman007 wrote:
>
> 23 November 2010
>
> The OpenWrt Release Team would like to announce a fourth release
> candidate (RC4) for Backfire Interim Release 1 (10.03.1). Testing of
> this release candidate will allow further refinement of 10.03.1
>
> * 2.6.32 targets updated from 2.6.32.16 to 2.6.32.25
>
>
> OpenWrt 10.03 is running 2.6.32.10, which is still ahead of kernel.org
>
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/smb/smb-2.6.32.y.git;a=commit;h=7f5e918e62cbc9ac27c2f47d3c3dd4b86f67ff0e
>
> 2010-02-23 Greg Kroah... Linux 2.6.32.9 master origin/HEAD
> origin/master v2.6.32.9
>
> stefan.bader at canonical.com is the branch/tree owner, ccd,
> FYI to kernelnewbies.
Um, you are not looking at the correct stable kernel branch on
git.kernel.org. I just released 2.6.32.33 the other day, so it looks
like you are just looking at an older kernel tree that has not been
updated.
good luck,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* is git.kernel.org the best place for stable releases ?
2011-03-16 19:53 ` Greg KH
@ 2011-03-16 20:39 ` Jim Cromie
2011-03-16 21:07 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jim Cromie @ 2011-03-16 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
ahh thanks.
I searched, and stopped at the 1st hit.
heres the correct one.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.32.y.git;a=summary
linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.32.y.git 2.6.32-stable tree Greg
Kroah-Hartman 2 months ago summary | shortlog | log | tree | git
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 01:47:28PM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
>> OpenWrt is apparently using a stable release that isnt on kernel.org
>>
>> Bartman007 wrote:
>>
>> 23 November 2010
>>
>> The OpenWrt Release Team would like to announce a fourth release
>> candidate (RC4) for Backfire Interim Release 1 (10.03.1). ?Testing of
>> this release candidate will allow further refinement of 10.03.1
>>
>> * 2.6.32 targets updated from 2.6.32.16 to 2.6.32.25
>>
>>
>> OpenWrt 10.03 is running 2.6.32.10, which is still ahead of kernel.org
>>
>>
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/smb/smb-2.6.32.y.git;a=commit;h=7f5e918e62cbc9ac27c2f47d3c3dd4b86f67ff0e
>>
>> 2010-02-23 ? ?Greg Kroah... ? Linux 2.6.32.9 master origin/HEAD
>> origin/master v2.6.32.9
>>
>> stefan.bader at canonical.com is the branch/tree owner, ccd,
>> FYI to kernelnewbies.
>
> Um, you are not looking at the correct stable kernel branch on
> git.kernel.org. ?I just released 2.6.32.33 the other day, so it looks
> like you are just looking at an older kernel tree that has not been
> updated.
>
> good luck,
>
> greg k-h
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* is git.kernel.org the best place for stable releases ?
2011-03-16 20:39 ` Jim Cromie
@ 2011-03-16 21:07 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2011-03-16 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies
A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 02:39:42PM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
> ahh thanks.
> I searched, and stopped at the 1st hit.
>
> heres the correct one.
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.32.y.git;a=summary
>
> linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.32.y.git 2.6.32-stable tree Greg
> Kroah-Hartman 2 months ago summary | shortlog | log | tree | git
Nope, almost, but not quite. For the .32 kernel, you want the
"longterm" kernel, it's at:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/longterm/linux-2.6.32.y.git
Hope this helps,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-03-16 21:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-03-16 19:47 is git.kernel.org the best place for stable releases ? Jim Cromie
2011-03-16 19:53 ` Greg KH
2011-03-16 20:39 ` Jim Cromie
2011-03-16 21:07 ` Greg KH
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.