All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* is git.kernel.org the best place for stable releases ?
@ 2011-03-16 19:47 Jim Cromie
  2011-03-16 19:53 ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jim Cromie @ 2011-03-16 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kernelnewbies

OpenWrt is apparently using a stable release that isnt on kernel.org

Bartman007 wrote:

23 November 2010

The OpenWrt Release Team would like to announce a fourth release
candidate (RC4) for Backfire Interim Release 1 (10.03.1).  Testing of
this release candidate will allow further refinement of 10.03.1

* 2.6.32 targets updated from 2.6.32.16 to 2.6.32.25


OpenWrt 10.03 is running 2.6.32.10, which is still ahead of kernel.org


http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/smb/smb-2.6.32.y.git;a=commit;h=7f5e918e62cbc9ac27c2f47d3c3dd4b86f67ff0e

2010-02-23	Greg Kroah...	Linux 2.6.32.9 master origin/HEAD
origin/master v2.6.32.9

stefan.bader at canonical.com is the branch/tree owner, ccd,
FYI to kernelnewbies.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* is git.kernel.org the best place for stable releases ?
  2011-03-16 19:47 is git.kernel.org the best place for stable releases ? Jim Cromie
@ 2011-03-16 19:53 ` Greg KH
  2011-03-16 20:39   ` Jim Cromie
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2011-03-16 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kernelnewbies

On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 01:47:28PM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
> OpenWrt is apparently using a stable release that isnt on kernel.org
> 
> Bartman007 wrote:
> 
> 23 November 2010
> 
> The OpenWrt Release Team would like to announce a fourth release
> candidate (RC4) for Backfire Interim Release 1 (10.03.1).  Testing of
> this release candidate will allow further refinement of 10.03.1
> 
> * 2.6.32 targets updated from 2.6.32.16 to 2.6.32.25
> 
> 
> OpenWrt 10.03 is running 2.6.32.10, which is still ahead of kernel.org
> 
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/smb/smb-2.6.32.y.git;a=commit;h=7f5e918e62cbc9ac27c2f47d3c3dd4b86f67ff0e
> 
> 2010-02-23	Greg Kroah...	Linux 2.6.32.9 master origin/HEAD
> origin/master v2.6.32.9
> 
> stefan.bader at canonical.com is the branch/tree owner, ccd,
> FYI to kernelnewbies.

Um, you are not looking at the correct stable kernel branch on
git.kernel.org.  I just released 2.6.32.33 the other day, so it looks
like you are just looking at an older kernel tree that has not been
updated.

good luck,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* is git.kernel.org the best place for stable releases ?
  2011-03-16 19:53 ` Greg KH
@ 2011-03-16 20:39   ` Jim Cromie
  2011-03-16 21:07     ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jim Cromie @ 2011-03-16 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kernelnewbies

ahh thanks.
I searched, and stopped at the 1st hit.

heres the correct one.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.32.y.git;a=summary

linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.32.y.git	2.6.32-stable tree	Greg
Kroah-Hartman	2 months ago	summary | shortlog | log | tree | git

On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 01:47:28PM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
>> OpenWrt is apparently using a stable release that isnt on kernel.org
>>
>> Bartman007 wrote:
>>
>> 23 November 2010
>>
>> The OpenWrt Release Team would like to announce a fourth release
>> candidate (RC4) for Backfire Interim Release 1 (10.03.1). ?Testing of
>> this release candidate will allow further refinement of 10.03.1
>>
>> * 2.6.32 targets updated from 2.6.32.16 to 2.6.32.25
>>
>>
>> OpenWrt 10.03 is running 2.6.32.10, which is still ahead of kernel.org
>>
>>
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/smb/smb-2.6.32.y.git;a=commit;h=7f5e918e62cbc9ac27c2f47d3c3dd4b86f67ff0e
>>
>> 2010-02-23 ? ?Greg Kroah... ? Linux 2.6.32.9 master origin/HEAD
>> origin/master v2.6.32.9
>>
>> stefan.bader at canonical.com is the branch/tree owner, ccd,
>> FYI to kernelnewbies.
>
> Um, you are not looking at the correct stable kernel branch on
> git.kernel.org. ?I just released 2.6.32.33 the other day, so it looks
> like you are just looking at an older kernel tree that has not been
> updated.
>
> good luck,
>
> greg k-h
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* is git.kernel.org the best place for stable releases ?
  2011-03-16 20:39   ` Jim Cromie
@ 2011-03-16 21:07     ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2011-03-16 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kernelnewbies


A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?

http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top

On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 02:39:42PM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
> ahh thanks.
> I searched, and stopped at the 1st hit.
> 
> heres the correct one.
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.32.y.git;a=summary
> 
> linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.32.y.git	2.6.32-stable tree	Greg
> Kroah-Hartman	2 months ago	summary | shortlog | log | tree | git

Nope, almost, but not quite.  For the .32 kernel, you want the
"longterm" kernel, it's at:
	http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/longterm/linux-2.6.32.y.git

Hope this helps,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-03-16 21:07 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-03-16 19:47 is git.kernel.org the best place for stable releases ? Jim Cromie
2011-03-16 19:53 ` Greg KH
2011-03-16 20:39   ` Jim Cromie
2011-03-16 21:07     ` Greg KH

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.