From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
james.bottomley@suse.de, dave.jiang@intel.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, jacek.danecki@intel.com,
ed.ciechanowski@intel.com, jeffrey.d.skirvin@intel.com,
edmund.nadolski@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] isci: hardware / topology event handling
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 05:08:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110323090824.GA14536@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinS9xZ3Jhg1C+jWNO0wj+MYW3qvbqc_acvnsOLS@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 02:04:28AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Not much beyond the defined semantics of cancel_delayed_work and
> delayed_work_pending. I was looking to eliminate the current open
> coded equivalent functionality.
What's the problem with del_timer_sync and timer_pending?
> I also want to get rid of the pre-allocation, which I assume was the
> reason for the original comment?
The preallocation is even more pointless. Just embedd the struct
timer_list where the code currently has a pointer to the timer object.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-23 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-07 0:34 [RFC PATCH 0/6] isci: initial driver release (part1: intro and lldd) Dan Williams
2011-02-07 0:34 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] isci: initialization Dan Williams
2011-02-17 8:22 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-02-19 0:12 ` Dan Williams
2011-02-17 8:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-02-19 0:23 ` Dan Williams
2011-03-04 23:35 ` James Bottomley
2011-03-08 1:51 ` Dan Williams
2011-03-18 16:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-02-07 0:34 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] isci: task (libsas interface support) Dan Williams
2011-02-09 15:01 ` David Milburn
2011-02-14 7:14 ` Dan Williams
2011-02-16 18:48 ` David Milburn
2011-02-16 19:35 ` David Milburn
2011-02-07 0:34 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] isci: request (core request infrastructure) Dan Williams
2011-03-18 16:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-02-07 0:34 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] isci: hardware / topology event handling Dan Williams
2011-03-18 16:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-23 8:15 ` Dan Williams
2011-03-23 8:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-23 9:04 ` Dan Williams
2011-03-23 9:08 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-03-24 0:07 ` Dan Williams
2011-03-24 6:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-25 0:57 ` Dan Williams
2011-03-25 19:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-25 21:39 ` Dan Williams
2011-03-25 22:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-25 22:34 ` Dan Williams
2011-03-27 22:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-29 1:11 ` Dan Williams
2011-03-30 0:37 ` Dan Williams
2011-02-07 0:35 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] isci: phy, port, and remote device Dan Williams
2011-02-07 0:35 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] isci: sata support and phy settings via request_firmware() Dan Williams
2011-02-07 7:58 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] isci: initialization jack_wang
2011-02-14 7:49 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110323090824.GA14536@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=ed.ciechanowski@intel.com \
--cc=edmund.nadolski@intel.com \
--cc=jacek.danecki@intel.com \
--cc=james.bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=jeffrey.d.skirvin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.