From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Teck Choon Giam <giamteckchoon@gmail.com>
Cc: Andreas Olsowski <andreas.olsowski@leuphana.de>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860! - ideas.
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:57:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110324115702.GD23293@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110316164001.GA29299@dumpdata.com>
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:40:01PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > - turn on CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> > > - turn on CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST
> > > - turn on CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
> > > - turn on CONFIG_JBD_DEBUG, CONFIG_JBD2_DEBUG
> > > - turn on CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON
> > >
> > > And see if anything starts coming out.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks a lot for both of you spending time to do so. It isn't easy as I
> > believe this is something related to kernel 2.6.32.x and just wondering is
> > there something related to *sched_domains? I read recent mails in LKML
>
> Hmmm.. no idea.
> > about rebuild_sched_domains consider dangerous issues... and that is about
> > recent kernels but won't know what recent kernels that refer to... ...
> >
> > I will do those config changes in one of my test server when time permit and
> > will post results/output here when done.
>
> OK. Thank you!
I've been using Jermey's latest tree: 2.6.32.32 (there is even a 2.6.32.33)
and I can't hit this bug anymore. Would appreciate your input if you still see this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-24 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-26 8:16 kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860! Teck Choon Giam
2010-12-27 15:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-12-27 22:14 ` Teck Choon Giam
2010-12-28 10:42 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-12-28 18:01 ` Teck Choon Giam
2010-12-29 4:25 ` Teck Choon Giam
2010-12-29 4:58 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-14 15:20 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-14 19:25 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-14 19:44 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-14 20:09 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-14 20:32 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-24 1:42 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-24 14:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-24 15:56 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-25 14:48 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-26 14:31 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-27 17:17 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-27 20:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-27 22:20 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-02-26 12:03 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-02-28 16:20 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-01 9:59 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-03 22:16 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-04 5:30 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-04 6:15 ` Fajar A. Nugraha
2011-03-04 6:33 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-08 19:29 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-08 20:10 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-08 20:20 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-08 20:45 ` Guido Hecken
2011-03-08 20:50 ` [SPAM] " tjaouen
2011-03-09 0:06 ` Andreas Olsowski
2011-03-11 18:38 ` benco
2011-03-11 19:59 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2011-03-11 20:29 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-11 20:45 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-11 21:02 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2011-03-11 21:15 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-09 0:43 ` [SPAM] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-09 6:58 ` Andreas Olsowski
2011-03-09 15:00 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-09 19:59 ` Andreas Olsowski
2011-03-10 7:20 ` Andreas Olsowski
2011-03-10 13:45 ` Andreas Olsowski
2011-03-11 18:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-14 10:25 ` Ian Campbell
2011-03-14 10:36 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-16 15:52 ` [SPAM] Re: kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860! - ideas Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-16 16:26 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-16 16:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-24 11:57 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2011-03-24 21:28 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-25 3:57 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-27 10:16 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-28 11:37 ` Andreas Olsowski
2011-03-28 12:29 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-04-05 22:01 ` Dave Hunter
2011-04-05 22:15 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-04-05 23:20 ` Dave Hunter
2011-04-06 7:53 ` Ian Campbell
2011-04-06 21:52 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-04-07 13:16 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-09 0:41 ` kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860! Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-04 15:10 ` Christophe Saout
2011-01-04 15:19 ` Christophe Saout
2011-01-04 15:37 ` benco
2011-01-04 18:40 ` Christophe Saout
2011-01-04 19:32 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-04 19:56 ` benco
2011-01-14 15:22 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-14 15:33 ` Christophe Saout
2011-01-04 23:10 ` Christophe Saout
2011-01-05 10:51 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2011-01-05 14:56 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-14 15:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-14 19:31 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-04 13:48 ` Ian Campbell
2011-01-04 19:24 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-05 15:30 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-13 14:28 ` tjaouen
2011-01-14 14:47 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110324115702.GD23293@dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=andreas.olsowski@leuphana.de \
--cc=giamteckchoon@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.