From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Dave Hunter <dave@ivt.com.au>,
Teck Choon Giam <giamteckchoon@gmail.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860! - ideas.
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 14:52:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D9CE0B3.9040204@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302076419.27835.0.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
On 04/06/2011 12:53 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Please don't top post.
>
> On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 00:20 +0100, Dave Hunter wrote:
>> Is it likely that Debian would release an updated kernel in squeeze with
>> this configuration? (sorry, this might not be the place to ask).
> I doubt they will, enabling DEBUG_PAGEALLOC seems very much like a
> workaround not a solution to me.
Yes, it will impose a pretty large performance overhead.
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-06 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-26 8:16 kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860! Teck Choon Giam
2010-12-27 15:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-12-27 22:14 ` Teck Choon Giam
2010-12-28 10:42 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-12-28 18:01 ` Teck Choon Giam
2010-12-29 4:25 ` Teck Choon Giam
2010-12-29 4:58 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-14 15:20 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-14 19:25 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-14 19:44 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-14 20:09 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-14 20:32 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-24 1:42 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-24 14:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-24 15:56 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-25 14:48 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-26 14:31 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-27 17:17 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-27 20:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-27 22:20 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-02-26 12:03 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-02-28 16:20 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-01 9:59 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-03 22:16 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-04 5:30 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-04 6:15 ` Fajar A. Nugraha
2011-03-04 6:33 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-08 19:29 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-08 20:10 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-08 20:20 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-08 20:45 ` Guido Hecken
2011-03-08 20:50 ` [SPAM] " tjaouen
2011-03-09 0:06 ` Andreas Olsowski
2011-03-11 18:38 ` benco
2011-03-11 19:59 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2011-03-11 20:29 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-11 20:45 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-11 21:02 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2011-03-11 21:15 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-09 0:43 ` [SPAM] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-09 6:58 ` Andreas Olsowski
2011-03-09 15:00 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-09 19:59 ` Andreas Olsowski
2011-03-10 7:20 ` Andreas Olsowski
2011-03-10 13:45 ` Andreas Olsowski
2011-03-11 18:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-14 10:25 ` Ian Campbell
2011-03-14 10:36 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-16 15:52 ` [SPAM] Re: kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860! - ideas Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-16 16:26 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-16 16:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-24 11:57 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-24 21:28 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-25 3:57 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-27 10:16 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-28 11:37 ` Andreas Olsowski
2011-03-28 12:29 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-04-05 22:01 ` Dave Hunter
2011-04-05 22:15 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-04-05 23:20 ` Dave Hunter
2011-04-06 7:53 ` Ian Campbell
2011-04-06 21:52 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2011-04-07 13:16 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-09 0:41 ` kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860! Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-04 15:10 ` Christophe Saout
2011-01-04 15:19 ` Christophe Saout
2011-01-04 15:37 ` benco
2011-01-04 18:40 ` Christophe Saout
2011-01-04 19:32 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-04 19:56 ` benco
2011-01-14 15:22 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-14 15:33 ` Christophe Saout
2011-01-04 23:10 ` Christophe Saout
2011-01-05 10:51 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2011-01-05 14:56 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-14 15:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-14 19:31 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-04 13:48 ` Ian Campbell
2011-01-04 19:24 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-05 15:30 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-13 14:28 ` tjaouen
2011-01-14 14:47 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D9CE0B3.9040204@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=dave@ivt.com.au \
--cc=giamteckchoon@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.