From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Core block IO bits for 2.6.39 - early Oops
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:41:28 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110325044128.GJ26611@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110324193441.GA1723@gentoo.trippels.de>
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 08:34:41PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2011.03.24 at 19:58 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On 2011-03-24 19:54, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > On 2011.03.24 at 19:51 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >> On 2011-03-24 19:36, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >>> On 2011-03-24 19:30, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > >>>> On 2011.03.24 at 14:43 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> This is the main pull request for the block IO layer and friends for
> > >>>>> 2.6.39.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This merge results in an early oops on my system (amd64, xfs).
> > >>>> See the attached photo.
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Auch. Can you ensure that you have CONFIG_DEBUGINFO=y in your .config
> > >>> and then do:
> > >>>
> > >>> $ gdb vmlinux
> > >>> ...
> > >>> l *cfq_insert_request+0x32
> > >>>
> > >>> and send that output?
> > >>
> > >> I took a closer look at the oops, and it most likely looks like q ==
> > >> NULL (offset 0x18 == q->elevator). You left out the Code part, so I
> > >> can't verify that for certain. Which makes very little sense. I take it
> > >> this is 100% reproducible? When you send the gdb output, please also
> > >> attach your .config.
> > >
> > > Yes, it's 100% reproducible here. My .config follows:
> >
> > Can you try this patch and see if it makes a difference?
>
> There's no patch ;-)
>
> > If you boot without the patch and add elevator=noop, does it then work?
>
> It works insofar as the Oops is gone. But my xfs partitions apparently
> still get corrupted (I had to run xfs_repair on several of them, because
> they would not mount otherwise).
So the patchset is causing repeatable filesystem corruption? Sounds
to me like this series is not yet ready for mainline merging. Last
thing I want to spend the .39 cycle helping people recover busted
filesystems as a result of undercooked block layer changes...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-25 4:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-24 13:43 [GIT PULL] Core block IO bits for 2.6.39 Jens Axboe
2011-03-24 18:30 ` [GIT PULL] Core block IO bits for 2.6.39 - early Oops Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-24 18:36 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-24 18:47 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-24 18:51 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-24 18:54 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-24 18:58 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-24 19:34 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-24 19:36 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-24 19:45 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-24 19:57 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-24 20:06 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-24 21:01 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-24 21:41 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-25 7:23 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-25 8:37 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-25 8:44 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-25 9:27 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-25 9:57 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-25 10:11 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-25 12:44 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-25 13:09 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-25 14:10 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-25 14:14 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-25 14:18 ` Chris Mason
2011-03-25 14:19 ` Chris Mason
2011-03-25 14:24 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-25 14:20 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-25 14:28 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-25 15:51 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-25 15:58 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-25 16:01 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-24 22:06 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-03-25 4:41 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2011-03-25 7:26 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-25 11:59 ` Theodore Tso
2011-03-25 12:14 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-25 12:33 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-03-25 12:43 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-25 13:01 ` Chris Mason
2011-03-25 21:35 ` [GIT PULL] Core block IO bits for 2.6.39 Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-03-26 6:29 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-26 7:21 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-03-26 8:25 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-26 8:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-03-26 9:26 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-26 16:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-03-26 16:53 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-26 18:48 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-27 13:21 ` Alan Cox
2011-03-27 11:49 ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-27 12:00 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110325044128.GJ26611@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.