All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Richard Cochran <richard.cochran@omicron.at>,
	ben@iagu.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] posix-timers: RCU conversion
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 17:43:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110405154318.GA20080@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302016682.3171.19.camel@edumazet-laptop>

On 04/05, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> Le mardi 05 avril 2011 à 16:48 +0200, Oleg Nesterov a écrit :
> >
> > Not that I really think it makes sense to change the patch... but we
> > could even use SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, this is more effective. All we
> > need is ctor which sets ->it_signal = NULL and initializes ->it_lock
> > for lock_timer().
> >
>
> I considered this, but this means SLUB cannot merge the
> posix_timers_cache anymore.

OK, I see.

> > The question is, why do we use the global database for the timer ids.
> > All timers live in signal_struct->posix_timers anyway, perhaps we could
> > use a per-process array instead.
> >
>
> This would add some overhead at process creation (to initialize the
> 'array' or whatever tree root).

I am not sure. This initialization should be as simple as
"p->timers_array = NULL".

But,

> It would help some workloads, (create/delete timers from lot of
> different processes/cpus). I am not sure we really need this right now,
> since we waited 2011 before even trying to optimize read side ;)

Yes, agreed.

So, I think the patch is fine.

Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-05 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-18 12:02 KVM lock contention on 48 core AMD machine Ben Nagy
2011-03-18 12:30 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-03-19  4:45   ` Ben Nagy
2011-03-21  9:50     ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-21 11:43       ` Ben Nagy
2011-03-21 13:41         ` Ben Nagy
2011-03-21 13:53           ` Avi Kivity
     [not found]             ` <AANLkTikWQS281kTtJ32-qo5U+w_BAak7qUwVhUQgOxxv@mail.gmail.com>
2011-03-21 15:50               ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-21 16:16                 ` Ben Nagy
2011-03-21 16:33                   ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-21 16:54                   ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-21 17:02                     ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-21 17:12                       ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-21 18:12                         ` Ben Nagy
2011-03-21 22:27                           ` [RFC] posix-timers: RCU conversion Eric Dumazet
2011-03-22  7:09                             ` [PATCH] " Eric Dumazet
2011-03-22  8:59                               ` Ben Nagy
2011-03-22 10:35                                 ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-22 10:35                                   ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-04  3:30                                   ` Ben Nagy
2011-04-04  7:18                                     ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-04  7:18                                       ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-05  7:49                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05  8:16                                     ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-05  8:16                                       ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-05  8:48                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05  8:56                                     ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-05  8:56                                       ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-05  9:03                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05  9:08                                         ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-05  9:08                                           ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-05  9:50                                         ` Ben Nagy
2011-04-05  8:56                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2011-04-03 16:54                               ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-04 18:08                                 ` john stultz
2011-04-04 19:47                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-05 14:48                                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-05 15:18                                     ` [PATCH v2] " Eric Dumazet
2011-04-05 15:43                                       ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-05-16 15:10                                       ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-16 15:30                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-08 18:28                                 ` [PATCH] " Paul E. McKenney
2011-03-21 18:14                         ` KVM lock contention on 48 core AMD machine Avi Kivity
2011-03-21 18:48                         ` Michael Tokarev
2011-03-21 18:53                           ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-18 12:44 ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110405154318.GA20080@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=ben@iagu.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard.cochran@omicron.at \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.