All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: ben@iagu.net, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
	Richard Cochran <richard.cochran@omicron.at>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] posix-timers: RCU conversion
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 12:08:45 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D9ADC1D.5010109@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1301994229.2225.30.camel@twins>

On 04/05/2011 12:03 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 11:56 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> >  Could be waking up due to guest wakeups, or qemu internal wakeups
> >  (display refresh) or due to guest timer sources which are masked away in
> >  the guest (if that's the case we should optimize it away).
>
> Right, so I guess we're all clutching at straws here :-)
>
> Ben how usable is that system when its in that state? Could you run a
> function trace or a trace with all kvm and sched trace-events enabled?

Ben, to do that, look up http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Tracing; the 
command for combined sched/kvm tracing is

# trace-cmd record -b 20000 -e kvm -e sched



-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: ben@iagu.net, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
	Richard Cochran <richard.cochran@omicron.at>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] posix-timers: RCU conversion
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 12:08:45 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D9ADC1D.5010109@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1301994229.2225.30.camel@twins>

On 04/05/2011 12:03 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 11:56 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> >  Could be waking up due to guest wakeups, or qemu internal wakeups
> >  (display refresh) or due to guest timer sources which are masked away in
> >  the guest (if that's the case we should optimize it away).
>
> Right, so I guess we're all clutching at straws here :-)
>
> Ben how usable is that system when its in that state? Could you run a
> function trace or a trace with all kvm and sched trace-events enabled?

Ben, to do that, look up http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Tracing; the 
command for combined sched/kvm tracing is

# trace-cmd record -b 20000 -e kvm -e sched



-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-05  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-18 12:02 KVM lock contention on 48 core AMD machine Ben Nagy
2011-03-18 12:30 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-03-19  4:45   ` Ben Nagy
2011-03-21  9:50     ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-21 11:43       ` Ben Nagy
2011-03-21 13:41         ` Ben Nagy
2011-03-21 13:53           ` Avi Kivity
     [not found]             ` <AANLkTikWQS281kTtJ32-qo5U+w_BAak7qUwVhUQgOxxv@mail.gmail.com>
2011-03-21 15:50               ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-21 16:16                 ` Ben Nagy
2011-03-21 16:33                   ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-21 16:54                   ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-21 17:02                     ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-21 17:12                       ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-21 18:12                         ` Ben Nagy
2011-03-21 22:27                           ` [RFC] posix-timers: RCU conversion Eric Dumazet
2011-03-22  7:09                             ` [PATCH] " Eric Dumazet
2011-03-22  8:59                               ` Ben Nagy
2011-03-22 10:35                                 ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-22 10:35                                   ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-04  3:30                                   ` Ben Nagy
2011-04-04  7:18                                     ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-04  7:18                                       ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-05  7:49                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05  8:16                                     ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-05  8:16                                       ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-05  8:48                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05  8:56                                     ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-05  8:56                                       ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-05  9:03                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05  9:08                                         ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-04-05  9:08                                           ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-05  9:50                                         ` Ben Nagy
2011-04-05  8:56                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2011-04-03 16:54                               ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-04 18:08                                 ` john stultz
2011-04-04 19:47                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-05 14:48                                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-05 15:18                                     ` [PATCH v2] " Eric Dumazet
2011-04-05 15:43                                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-16 15:10                                       ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-16 15:30                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-08 18:28                                 ` [PATCH] " Paul E. McKenney
2011-03-21 18:14                         ` KVM lock contention on 48 core AMD machine Avi Kivity
2011-03-21 18:48                         ` Michael Tokarev
2011-03-21 18:53                           ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-18 12:44 ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D9ADC1D.5010109@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=ben@iagu.net \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard.cochran@omicron.at \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.