From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Intel Linux Wireless <ilw@linux.intel.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>,
Meenakshi Venkataraman <meenakshi.venkataraman@intel.com>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Subject: Re: [Patch] iwlwifi: remove obsoleted module alias and parameters
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:57:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110406125728.GA2197@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D9C43A8.5060500@redhat.com>
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 06:42:48PM +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> 于 2011年04月06日 18:09, Johannes Berg 写道:
> >On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 17:49 +0800, Amerigo Wang wrote:
> >>As scheduled in Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt,
> >>remove "*50", "disable_hw_scan" module parameters and MODULE_ALIAS("iwl4965").
> >
> >Mostly fine, but for iwlegacy Stanislaw we want to keep hw scan (and it
> >was actually made default now)
Indeed, disable_hw_scan should be removed in iwlwifi but leaved in iwlegacy.
> Ok, I will wait for Stanislaw's response and then send an updated patch.
Have it now :-)
Stanislaw
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Cong Wang <amwang-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>,
linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Intel Linux Wireless
<ilw-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
"John W. Linville"
<linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>,
Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Meenakshi Venkataraman
<meenakshi.venkataraman-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Larry Finger
<Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] iwlwifi: remove obsoleted module alias and parameters
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:57:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110406125728.GA2197@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D9C43A8.5060500-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 06:42:48PM +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> 于 2011年04月06日 18:09, Johannes Berg 写道:
> >On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 17:49 +0800, Amerigo Wang wrote:
> >>As scheduled in Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt,
> >>remove "*50", "disable_hw_scan" module parameters and MODULE_ALIAS("iwl4965").
> >
> >Mostly fine, but for iwlegacy Stanislaw we want to keep hw scan (and it
> >was actually made default now)
Indeed, disable_hw_scan should be removed in iwlwifi but leaved in iwlegacy.
> Ok, I will wait for Stanislaw's response and then send an updated patch.
Have it now :-)
Stanislaw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-06 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-06 9:49 [Patch] iwlwifi: remove obsoleted module alias and parameters Amerigo Wang
2011-04-06 9:49 ` Amerigo Wang
2011-04-06 10:09 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-06 10:42 ` Cong Wang
2011-04-06 12:57 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2011-04-06 12:57 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-04-06 15:14 ` John W. Linville
2011-04-06 15:14 ` John W. Linville
2011-04-06 15:19 ` John W. Linville
2011-04-12 20:49 ` John W. Linville
2011-04-12 20:49 ` John W. Linville
2011-04-13 11:53 ` Cong Wang
2011-04-06 14:05 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2011-04-07 7:17 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110406125728.GA2197@redhat.com \
--to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=meenakshi.venkataraman@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.