All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Allow for kernel command line concatenation
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 12:58:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110407105850.GJ13963@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302172525.24493.7.camel@t41.thuisdomein>

On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 12:35:01PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 10:17 +0200, oskar.andero at sonyericsson.com wrote:
> > +config CMDLINE_EXTEND
> > +	bool "Extend bootloader kernel arguments"
> > +	depends on CMDLINE != ""
> > +	help
> > +	  The default kernel command string will be concatenated with the
> > +	  arguments provided by the boot loader.
> 
> This suggests the parameters provided by the boot loader will override
> corresponding parameters of the default kernel command string. Is that
> correct (for all possible parameters)?
> 
> Either way, shouldn't it be documented, perhaps in this help text, what
> will happen if a parameter of the default kernel command string and a
> parameter provided by the boot loader somehow conflict?
Then you will end up with both parameters I guess. What happens depends
on the parameter in question I guess. IMHO the description is fine.
But I wonder if the new mechanism is useful in the end.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: oskar.andero@sonyericsson.com, nicolas.pitre@linaro.org,
	linux@arm.linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	eric.y.miao@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Victor Boivie <victor.boivie@sonyericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Allow for kernel command line concatenation
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 12:58:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110407105850.GJ13963@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302172525.24493.7.camel@t41.thuisdomein>

On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 12:35:01PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 10:17 +0200, oskar.andero@sonyericsson.com wrote:
> > +config CMDLINE_EXTEND
> > +	bool "Extend bootloader kernel arguments"
> > +	depends on CMDLINE != ""
> > +	help
> > +	  The default kernel command string will be concatenated with the
> > +	  arguments provided by the boot loader.
> 
> This suggests the parameters provided by the boot loader will override
> corresponding parameters of the default kernel command string. Is that
> correct (for all possible parameters)?
> 
> Either way, shouldn't it be documented, perhaps in this help text, what
> will happen if a parameter of the default kernel command string and a
> parameter provided by the boot loader somehow conflict?
Then you will end up with both parameters I guess. What happens depends
on the parameter in question I guess. IMHO the description is fine.
But I wonder if the new mechanism is useful in the end.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-07 10:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-07  8:17 [PATCH] ARM: Allow for kernel command line concatenation oskar.andero at sonyericsson.com
2011-04-07  8:17 ` oskar.andero
2011-04-07  9:01 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-07  9:01   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-07 10:35 ` Paul Bolle
2011-04-07 10:35   ` Paul Bolle
2011-04-07 10:58   ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2011-04-07 10:58     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-07 11:38     ` Boivie, Victor
2011-04-07 11:38       ` Boivie, Victor
2011-04-07 13:18 ` Nick Bowler
2011-04-07 13:18   ` Nick Bowler
2011-04-07 13:22   ` Boivie, Victor
2011-04-07 13:22     ` Boivie, Victor
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-07 11:47 oskar.andero at sonyericsson.com
2011-04-07 11:47 ` oskar.andero
2011-04-07 13:29 oskar.andero at sonyericsson.com
2011-04-07 13:29 ` oskar.andero
2011-04-07 18:50 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-04-07 18:50   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-04-07 19:15 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-07 19:15   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-08  9:36 oskar.andero at sonyericsson.com
2011-04-08  9:36 ` oskar.andero
2011-04-08 12:19 ` Andrea Adami
2011-05-04 15:03 ` oskar.andero at sonyericsson.com
2011-05-04 15:03   ` oskar.andero
2011-05-04 15:11   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-05-04 15:11     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-05-04 16:10     ` oskar.andero at sonyericsson.com
2011-05-04 16:10       ` oskar.andero

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110407105850.GJ13963@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.