From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@suse.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/6] ARM: move SH-mobile runtime PM to arm/common for sharing with other platforms
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 01:56:54 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110407165654.GD8052@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302134569-22825-5-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com>
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:02:47PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> There is really nothing SH-mobile specific about this runtime PM
> implementation. Any platform wanting to implement runtime PM based on
> simple clock gating can use this implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
This observation is wholly architecture agnostic, so it's not clear that
keeping it in arch/arm/common is any better. It seems that this would be
better suited for drivers/base/power/ with a generic Kconfig symbol.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/6] ARM: move SH-mobile runtime PM to arm/common for sharing with other platforms
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 16:56:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110407165654.GD8052@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302134569-22825-5-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com>
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:02:47PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> There is really nothing SH-mobile specific about this runtime PM
> implementation. Any platform wanting to implement runtime PM based on
> simple clock gating can use this implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
This observation is wholly architecture agnostic, so it's not clear that
keeping it in arch/arm/common is any better. It seems that this would be
better suited for drivers/base/power/ with a generic Kconfig symbol.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lethal@linux-sh.org (Paul Mundt)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH/RFC 4/6] ARM: move SH-mobile runtime PM to arm/common for sharing with other platforms
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 01:56:54 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110407165654.GD8052@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302134569-22825-5-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com>
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:02:47PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> There is really nothing SH-mobile specific about this runtime PM
> implementation. Any platform wanting to implement runtime PM based on
> simple clock gating can use this implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
This observation is wholly architecture agnostic, so it's not clear that
keeping it in arch/arm/common is any better. It seems that this would be
better suited for drivers/base/power/ with a generic Kconfig symbol.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-07 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-07 0:02 [PATCH/RFC 0/6] ARM: runtime PM: consolidate runtime PM implementations Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/6] ARM: sh-mobile: runtime PM: convert to device powerdomains Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/6] OMAP2+: PM: move runtime PM implementation to use device power domains Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 5:49 ` Grant Likely
2011-04-07 5:49 ` Grant Likely
2011-04-07 5:49 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/6] OMAP2+: PM: move runtime PM implementation to Grant Likely
2011-06-09 14:30 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/6] OMAP2+: PM: move runtime PM implementation to use device power domains Sakari Ailus
2011-06-09 16:37 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-06-10 6:57 ` N900 USB fix (Was: Re: [PATCH/RFC 2/6] OMAP2+: PM: move runtime PM implementation to use device power domains) Sakari Ailus
2011-06-13 8:28 ` Jarkko Nikula
2011-06-13 8:46 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-06-13 8:47 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-04-07 0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/6] OMAP1: runtime PM: drop platform bus implementation Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/6] ARM: move SH-mobile runtime PM to arm/common for sharing with other platforms Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 16:56 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2011-04-07 16:56 ` Paul Mundt
2011-04-07 16:56 ` Paul Mundt
2011-04-07 17:08 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 17:08 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 17:08 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 22:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-07 22:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-07 22:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-08 0:38 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-08 0:38 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-08 0:38 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-08 5:01 ` Paul Mundt
2011-04-08 5:01 ` Paul Mundt
2011-04-08 5:01 ` Paul Mundt
2011-04-07 0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 5/6] ARM: use common clock-based runtime PM implementation on SH-mobile & OMAP1 Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 6/6] Revert "driver core: platform_bus: allow runtime override of dev_pm_ops" Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 5:38 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/6] ARM: runtime PM: consolidate runtime PM implementations Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-07 5:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-07 5:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-07 14:58 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 14:58 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 14:58 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 17:17 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 17:17 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 17:17 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 17:17 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 22:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-07 22:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-07 22:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-07 22:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-08 0:32 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-08 0:32 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-08 0:32 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-08 0:32 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 14:58 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110407165654.GD8052@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.