From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
To: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Subject: Re: [RFT] p54: implement multicast + arp req PS filter
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 00:24:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201104100024.30155.chunkeey@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201104100023.52526.jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
On Saturday 09 April 2011 22:23:51 Max Filippov wrote:
>>> So, I associated with that AP and obtained an IP address.
>> Just a question, that popped into my head: "Have you enabled PS?
>> either with "iw dev wlanX set power_save on" or
>> ?iwconfig wlanX power on?, because the filters may be restricted
>> to PSM.
>
> I hadn't. LMAC API doc doesn't say that they're related.
> This time I ran tests both with "iwconfig wlan0 power on"
> and without it. Looks like PSM only makes kernel print
> "wlan0: detected beacon loss from AP - sending probe request".
> I see no other effect.
Well, that settles that.
>>[..]
> In the ARP case, when there's no other traffic on p54spi, all ARP requests
> are dropped. But if there's some egress traffic from p54spi, filter seems
> to work correctly: only ARP requests that match filter pass through.
"no other traffic" sounds like a the psm filter at work, have you disabled
it before starting the experiment?
or apply:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg65488.html
(this patch makes the psm less aggressive by only sleeping
for one beacon interval at most [instead of listen_interval = 5]).
> In the multicast case filter seems to work correctly, but it treats broadcast
> as subject to that filtering too. By default only 01:00:5e:00:00:01 gets into
> priv->mc_maclist, so we miss all broadcasts.
ok, so we have to reserve a spot of ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff.
> These two filters seem to interfere:
> - if we set ARP filter and multicast filter without broadcast, we miss all
> ARPs if there's no egress traffic;
> - if we set ARP filter and multicast filter with broadcast, or don't set
> multicast filter at all we get all ARPs.
>
> This effect does not depend on filter setup order.
interesting, well a unnamed [but trustworthy] source told us that ST identified
a problem with the arp/multicast filter some time ago, unfortunately I haven't
seen any updated p54spi firmwares lately. Maybe this sagred stuff works?
Thanks,
Christian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-09 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-01 22:58 [RFT] p54: implement multicast + arp req PS filter Christian Lamparter
2011-04-07 23:28 ` Max Filippov
2011-04-08 13:08 ` Christian Lamparter
2011-04-09 20:23 ` Max Filippov
2011-04-09 22:24 ` Christian Lamparter [this message]
2011-04-09 23:34 ` Max Filippov
2011-04-09 23:54 ` Christian Lamparter
2011-04-10 0:41 ` Max Filippov
2011-04-13 21:48 ` Max Filippov
2011-04-14 19:13 ` Christian Lamparter
2011-04-14 20:34 ` Max Filippov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201104100024.30155.chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--to=chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.