All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@domain.hid>
To: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] arm ixp: more trouble with recent xenomai
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:14:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110411171437.GA3715@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DA17996.3010103@domain.hid>

On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:34:14AM +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Richard Cochran wrote:
> > I will try xenomai 2.5 with ipipe 2.6.35 next...

I meant to say, Xenomai 2.4 with ipipe 2.6.35, but this does not work
because the kernel definitions have changed:

 include/asm-generic/xenomai/hal.h: In function 'rthal_get_cpufreq':
 include/asm-generic/xenomai/hal.h:168: error: 'struct ipipe_sysinfo' has no member named 'cpufreq'
 include/asm-generic/xenomai/hal.h: In function 'rthal_get_timerfreq':
 include/asm-generic/xenomai/hal.h:175: error: 'struct ipipe_sysinfo' has no member named 'archdep'

But I think its not worth the effort to try that combination.

> Ok, please try Xenomai 2.5.6 with I-pipe for 2.6.30, in order to know if
> the difference comes from the I-pipe of from Xenomai.

So here is what I measured. Despite all the performance enhancements
added in Xenomai 2.5, it seems that 2.4 still performs better on my
platform. The difference isn't huge, but it is visible.

  |------------+------+------------+-------+---------+---------+---------+----------|
  | Kernel     |      | Xeno       | IPIPE |         |         |         |          |
  | Vers       | FCSE | Vers       | DEBUG | lat min | lat avg | lat max | duration |
  |------------+------+------------+-------+---------+---------+---------+----------|
  | v30        | yes  | v2.4.10    | no    |   8.430 |  17.310 |  63.510 | 00:02:35 |
  | v30        | yes  | v2.5.6 [1] | no    |   7.260 |  32.745 |  80.775 | 00:03:09 |
  | v30        | yes  | v2.5.6 [2] | no    |   7.140 |  34.950 |  78.375 | 00:03:21 |
  |------------+------+------------+-------+---------+---------+---------+----------|
  | v31        | yes  | v2.5.6     | no    |   7.215 |  34.020 |  85.350 | 00:02:58 |
  | v33        | yes  | v2.5.6     | yes   |  17.250 |  55.815 | 127.516 | 00:02:00 |
  | v35        | yes  | v2.5.6     | yes   |   7.140 |  34.200 |  84.180 | 00:02:17 |
  | v35-revert | yes  | v2.5.6     | no    |   7.350 |  29.430 |  85.185 | 00:05:50 |
  | v35        | no   | v2.5.6     | no    |   6.960 | 109.500 | 214.156 | 00:09:41 |
  |------------+------+------------+-------+---------+---------+---------+----------|

  [1] CONFIG_IPIPE_WANT_PREEMPTIBLE_SWITCH=y
  [2] CONFIG_IPIPE_WANT_PREEMPTIBLE_SWITCH=n

Gilles, I will try your tsc test program later this week...

Thanks,
Richard


  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-11 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-09 18:41 [Xenomai-core] arm ixp: more trouble with recent xenomai Richard Cochran
2011-04-09 18:55 ` Richard Cochran
2011-04-09 19:37   ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-09 19:50     ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-10  5:22       ` Richard Cochran
2011-04-10  6:52       ` Richard Cochran
2011-04-10  9:34         ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-11 17:14           ` Richard Cochran [this message]
2011-04-11 21:26             ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-12  5:43               ` Richard Cochran
2011-04-12  7:17                 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-12  9:42                   ` Richard Cochran
2011-04-12 10:00                     ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-14 16:49                   ` Richard Cochran
2011-04-15 13:18                     ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-10 11:22         ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-11  5:53           ` Richard Cochran
2011-04-11  7:24             ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-14 16:42           ` Richard Cochran
2011-04-15 13:24             ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-22  5:55               ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-22  6:16                 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-23 14:21                 ` Richard Cochran
2011-04-23 15:22                   ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-24 20:15                 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-25  6:48                   ` Richard Cochran
2011-04-25  7:29                     ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-26 11:25                       ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-05-12  0:03             ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-05-12 17:04               ` Richard Cochran
2011-04-09 19:43 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110411171437.GA3715@domain.hid \
    --to=richardcochran@domain.hid \
    --cc=gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org \
    --cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.