From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@domain.hid>
To: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] arm ixp: more trouble with recent xenomai
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 19:04:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110512170432.GA4659@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DCB23D6.9010706@domain.hid>
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:03:34AM +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> the issue on ixp looks like the last one to be fixed on arm. If you have
> time, could you try the following program? It makes a very basic test,
> but not having a big-endian ixp at end, I am wondering about very basic
> assumptions...:
~> armeb-unknown-linux-gnueabi-gcc -Wall arm.c
arm.c: In function 'f':
arm.c:7: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
arm.c: In function 'g':
arm.c:13: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
and then
# ./a.out
f: ffffffff
g: ffffffff
> If you do not have time, do you agree for a revert of the KUSER_TSC code
> to the one we had before, and which is working for you?
I sorry about not getting back about this. I have had crunch trying to
meet a deadline, but now that is over. Tomorrow I'm on the road, but
next week looks good for IXP testing.
And thanks, thanks, for all your good work,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-12 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-09 18:41 [Xenomai-core] arm ixp: more trouble with recent xenomai Richard Cochran
2011-04-09 18:55 ` Richard Cochran
2011-04-09 19:37 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-09 19:50 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-10 5:22 ` Richard Cochran
2011-04-10 6:52 ` Richard Cochran
2011-04-10 9:34 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-11 17:14 ` Richard Cochran
2011-04-11 21:26 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-12 5:43 ` Richard Cochran
2011-04-12 7:17 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-12 9:42 ` Richard Cochran
2011-04-12 10:00 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-14 16:49 ` Richard Cochran
2011-04-15 13:18 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-10 11:22 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-11 5:53 ` Richard Cochran
2011-04-11 7:24 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-14 16:42 ` Richard Cochran
2011-04-15 13:24 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-22 5:55 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-22 6:16 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-23 14:21 ` Richard Cochran
2011-04-23 15:22 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-24 20:15 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-25 6:48 ` Richard Cochran
2011-04-25 7:29 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-04-26 11:25 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-05-12 0:03 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-05-12 17:04 ` Richard Cochran [this message]
2011-04-09 19:43 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110512170432.GA4659@domain.hid \
--to=richardcochran@domain.hid \
--cc=gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.