From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
To: Natarajan Gurumoorthy <natg@google.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>,
"lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] Use "request_muxed_region" in it87 watchdog drivers
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 22:58:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110415055852.GA21905@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=t+AgRU47DhKoGOJ2mTa6AVfaPVw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:14:32PM -0400, Natarajan Gurumoorthy wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Guenter Roeck
> <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com> wrote:
> > Unless I am missing something, the problem is that there is another driver
> > calling request_region() instead of request_muxed_region().
> >
> > w83697hf_check_wdt() (and other drivers doing the same) should call
> > request_muxed_region(). Otherwise, the same problem could happen with the
> > caller(s) of request_region() - those calls could fail as well.
> > Plus, other callers of request_muxed_reason() not implementing
> > your retry code could end up with the same problem, ie with spurious failures.
> >
> > I think we will have to find a solution which does not require retries
> > when calling request_muxed_region(). On the other side, others know
> > this code much better than I do, so maybe someone has a better solution.
> >
> Guenter,
> Your conclusion is on the money. request_muxed_region will fail if
> someone else called request_region for the same region. The knife cuts
> both ways and reguest_region will fail when a request_muxed_region
> calll has been made for the same zone. I am not sure what happens
> when the second driver calls request_muxed_region for only part of the
> region that has been reserved by another driver. This is of course one
> of the problems. The other problem is that there are drivers which
> don't call either of those 2 interfaces and just go ahead and clobber
> the 0x2e 0x2f zone because they think they own all of it. I created a
> list drivers in hwmon and watchdog directories that need to be fixed
> in one of my earlier emails. John Delvare replied that are other
> drivers in parport that all need fixing. I got started on this because
> we use 2 different it87 drivers (hwmon/it87.c and
> watchdog/it8712f_wdt.c) concurrently and had to solve this problem.
>
I have seen the list. I don't think you should fix everything in one go.
First step might be to get the w83697hf and it87 to work together, then
go from there.
Is there a reason for loading (or trying to load) both the it87 and
the w83697hf driver at the same time ? Those drivers are usually only
loaded if the respective chip is known to exist. If there is no reason
to try loading both drivers, a simple workaround would be to not do it.
Thanks,
Guenter
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
To: Natarajan Gurumoorthy <natg@google.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>,
"lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH v6 1/2] Use "request_muxed_region" in it87
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 05:58:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110415055852.GA21905@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=t+AgRU47DhKoGOJ2mTa6AVfaPVw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:14:32PM -0400, Natarajan Gurumoorthy wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Guenter Roeck
> <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com> wrote:
> > Unless I am missing something, the problem is that there is another driver
> > calling request_region() instead of request_muxed_region().
> >
> > w83697hf_check_wdt() (and other drivers doing the same) should call
> > request_muxed_region(). Otherwise, the same problem could happen with the
> > caller(s) of request_region() - those calls could fail as well.
> > Plus, other callers of request_muxed_reason() not implementing
> > your retry code could end up with the same problem, ie with spurious failures.
> >
> > I think we will have to find a solution which does not require retries
> > when calling request_muxed_region(). On the other side, others know
> > this code much better than I do, so maybe someone has a better solution.
> >
> Guenter,
> Your conclusion is on the money. request_muxed_region will fail if
> someone else called request_region for the same region. The knife cuts
> both ways and reguest_region will fail when a request_muxed_region
> calll has been made for the same zone. I am not sure what happens
> when the second driver calls request_muxed_region for only part of the
> region that has been reserved by another driver. This is of course one
> of the problems. The other problem is that there are drivers which
> don't call either of those 2 interfaces and just go ahead and clobber
> the 0x2e 0x2f zone because they think they own all of it. I created a
> list drivers in hwmon and watchdog directories that need to be fixed
> in one of my earlier emails. John Delvare replied that are other
> drivers in parport that all need fixing. I got started on this because
> we use 2 different it87 drivers (hwmon/it87.c and
> watchdog/it8712f_wdt.c) concurrently and had to solve this problem.
>
I have seen the list. I don't think you should fix everything in one go.
First step might be to get the w83697hf and it87 to work together, then
go from there.
Is there a reason for loading (or trying to load) both the it87 and
the w83697hf driver at the same time ? Those drivers are usually only
loaded if the respective chip is known to exist. If there is no reason
to try loading both drivers, a simple workaround would be to not do it.
Thanks,
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-15 5:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-14 21:36 [PATCH v6 0/2] Make all it87 drivers SMP safe Nat Gurumoorthy
2011-04-14 21:36 ` [lm-sensors] " Nat Gurumoorthy
2011-04-14 21:37 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] Use "request_muxed_region" in it87 watchdog drivers Nat Gurumoorthy
2011-04-14 21:37 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v6 1/2] Use "request_muxed_region" in it87 Nat Gurumoorthy
2011-04-14 22:49 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] Use "request_muxed_region" in it87 watchdog drivers Guenter Roeck
2011-04-14 22:49 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v6 1/2] Use "request_muxed_region" in it87 Guenter Roeck
2011-04-15 1:18 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] Use "request_muxed_region" in it87 watchdog drivers Natarajan Gurumoorthy
2011-04-15 1:18 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v6 1/2] Use "request_muxed_region" in it87 Natarajan Gurumoorthy
2011-04-15 2:40 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] Use "request_muxed_region" in it87 watchdog drivers Guenter Roeck
2011-04-15 2:40 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v6 1/2] Use "request_muxed_region" in it87 Guenter Roeck
2011-04-15 3:14 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] Use "request_muxed_region" in it87 watchdog drivers Natarajan Gurumoorthy
2011-04-15 3:14 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v6 1/2] Use "request_muxed_region" in it87 Natarajan Gurumoorthy
2011-04-15 5:58 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2011-04-15 5:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-04-15 8:46 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] Use "request_muxed_region" in it87 watchdog drivers Natarajan Gurumoorthy
2011-04-15 8:46 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v6 1/2] Use "request_muxed_region" in it87 Natarajan Gurumoorthy
2011-04-15 11:05 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] Use "request_muxed_region" in it87 watchdog drivers Guenter Roeck
2011-04-15 11:05 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v6 1/2] Use "request_muxed_region" in it87 Guenter Roeck
2011-04-18 7:33 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v6 1/2] Use "request_muxed_region" in it87 watchdog drivers Hans de Goede
2011-04-18 7:33 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v6 1/2] Use "request_muxed_region" in it87 Hans de Goede
2011-04-14 21:38 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] Use "request_muxed_region" in it87 hwmon drivers Nat Gurumoorthy
2011-04-14 21:38 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v6 2/2] Use "request_muxed_region" in it87 Nat Gurumoorthy
2011-04-15 21:07 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] Make all it87 drivers SMP safe Jarod Wilson
2011-04-15 21:07 ` [lm-sensors] " Jarod Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110415055852.GA21905@ericsson.com \
--to=guenter.roeck@ericsson.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=mikew@google.com \
--cc=natg@google.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.