All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm/vmalloc: remove guard page from between vmap blocks
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:30:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110419083059.GA23041@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110414211441.GA1700@cmpxchg.org>

On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 05:14:41PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> The vmap allocator is used to, among other things, allocate per-cpu
> vmap blocks, where each vmap block is naturally aligned to its own
> size.  Obviously, leaving a guard page after each vmap area forbids
> packing vmap blocks efficiently and can make the kernel run out of
> possible vmap blocks long before overall vmap space is exhausted.
> 
> The new interface to map a user-supplied page array into linear
> vmalloc space (vm_map_ram) insists on allocating from a vmap block
> (instead of falling back to a custom area) when the area size is below
> a certain threshold.  With heavy users of this interface (e.g. XFS)
> and limited vmalloc space on 32-bit, vmap block exhaustion is a real
> problem.
> 
> Remove the guard page from the core vmap allocator.  vmalloc and the
> old vmap interface enforce a guard page on their own at a higher
> level.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>

If necessary, the guard page could be reintroduced as a debugging-only
option (CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC?). Otherwise it seems reasonable.

Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm/vmalloc: remove guard page from between vmap blocks
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:30:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110419083059.GA23041@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110414211441.GA1700@cmpxchg.org>

On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 05:14:41PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> The vmap allocator is used to, among other things, allocate per-cpu
> vmap blocks, where each vmap block is naturally aligned to its own
> size.  Obviously, leaving a guard page after each vmap area forbids
> packing vmap blocks efficiently and can make the kernel run out of
> possible vmap blocks long before overall vmap space is exhausted.
> 
> The new interface to map a user-supplied page array into linear
> vmalloc space (vm_map_ram) insists on allocating from a vmap block
> (instead of falling back to a custom area) when the area size is below
> a certain threshold.  With heavy users of this interface (e.g. XFS)
> and limited vmalloc space on 32-bit, vmap block exhaustion is a real
> problem.
> 
> Remove the guard page from the core vmap allocator.  vmalloc and the
> old vmap interface enforce a guard page on their own at a higher
> level.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>

If necessary, the guard page could be reintroduced as a debugging-only
option (CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC?). Otherwise it seems reasonable.

Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-19  8:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-14 21:14 [patch] mm/vmalloc: remove guard page from between vmap blocks Johannes Weiner
2011-04-14 21:14 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-04-19  8:30 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2011-04-19  8:30   ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110419083059.GA23041@csn.ul.ie \
    --to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.