All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: NFS <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd41: make sure nfs server process OPEN with EXCLUSIVE4_1 correcttly
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:00:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110420210020.GG15919@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DAEA562.1040605@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 05:20:34PM +0800, Mi Jinlong wrote:
> 
> 
> J. Bruce Fields:
> > And I'd rather avoid these ifdef's in the main part of the code.  Could
> > we move the definition of NFS4_CREATE_EXCLUSIVE4_1 someplace common
> > instead?
> 
>   Maybe we don't need the ifdef here.

OK, thanks--applying this version for 2.6.40.

--b.

> 
> -- 
> ----
> thanks
> Mi Jinlong
> ============================================================
> >From 7363f39c0159e78bafcab3a002a6808d375f49f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2011 17:06:25 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] nfsd41: make sure nfs server process OPEN with EXCLUSIVE4_1 correcttly
> 
> NFS server can't process OPEN with EXCLUSIVE4_1, because NFS server call 
> nfsd_create_v3 to create file instead implement a separate one. 
> But nfsd_create_v3 can't process createmode is EXCLUSIVE4_1.
> 
> This patch rename nfsd_create_v3() to do_nfsd_create(), and add some codes
> about process EXCLUSIVE4_1.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c |    2 +-
>  fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c |    4 ++--
>  fs/nfsd/vfs.c      |   20 ++++++++++++++++----
>  fs/nfsd/vfs.h      |    2 +-
>  4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c
> index 2247fc9..9095f3c 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c
> @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ nfsd3_proc_create(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd3_createargs *argp,
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Now create the file and set attributes */
> -	nfserr = nfsd_create_v3(rqstp, dirfhp, argp->name, argp->len,
> +	nfserr = do_nfsd_create(rqstp, dirfhp, argp->name, argp->len,
>  				attr, newfhp,
>  				argp->createmode, argp->verf, NULL, NULL);
>  
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> index 5fcb139..e1d100f 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -196,9 +196,9 @@ do_open_lookup(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *current_fh, struct nfsd4_o
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * Note: create modes (UNCHECKED,GUARDED...) are the same
> -		 * in NFSv4 as in v3.
> +		 * in NFSv4 as in v3 except EXCLUSIVE4_1.
>  		 */
> -		status = nfsd_create_v3(rqstp, current_fh, open->op_fname.data,
> +		status = do_nfsd_create(rqstp, current_fh, open->op_fname.data,
>  					open->op_fname.len, &open->op_iattr,
>  					&resfh, open->op_createmode,
>  					(u32 *)open->op_verf.data,
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> index 2e1cebd..fee2530 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> @@ -1340,11 +1340,18 @@ out_nfserr:
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NFSD_V3
> +
> +static inline int nfsd_create_is_exclusive(int createmode)
> +{
> +	return createmode == NFS3_CREATE_EXCLUSIVE
> +	       || createmode == NFS4_CREATE_EXCLUSIVE4_1;
> +}
> +
>  /*
> - * NFSv3 version of nfsd_create
> + * NFSv3 and NFSv4 version of nfsd_create
>   */
>  __be32
> -nfsd_create_v3(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
> +do_nfsd_create(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
>  		char *fname, int flen, struct iattr *iap,
>  		struct svc_fh *resfhp, int createmode, u32 *verifier,
>  	        int *truncp, int *created)
> @@ -1389,7 +1396,7 @@ nfsd_create_v3(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
>  	if (err)
>  		goto out;
>  
> -	if (createmode == NFS3_CREATE_EXCLUSIVE) {
> +	if (nfsd_create_is_exclusive(createmode)) {
>  		/* solaris7 gets confused (bugid 4218508) if these have
>  		 * the high bit set, so just clear the high bits. If this is
>  		 * ever changed to use different attrs for storing the
> @@ -1430,6 +1437,11 @@ nfsd_create_v3(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
>  			    && dchild->d_inode->i_atime.tv_sec == v_atime
>  			    && dchild->d_inode->i_size  == 0 )
>  				break;
> +		case NFS4_CREATE_EXCLUSIVE4_1:
> +			if (   dchild->d_inode->i_mtime.tv_sec == v_mtime
> +			    && dchild->d_inode->i_atime.tv_sec == v_atime
> +			    && dchild->d_inode->i_size  == 0 )
> +				goto set_attr;
>  			 /* fallthru */
>  		case NFS3_CREATE_GUARDED:
>  			err = nfserr_exist;
> @@ -1448,7 +1460,7 @@ nfsd_create_v3(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
>  
>  	nfsd_check_ignore_resizing(iap);
>  
> -	if (createmode == NFS3_CREATE_EXCLUSIVE) {
> +	if (nfsd_create_is_exclusive(createmode)) {
>  		/* Cram the verifier into atime/mtime */
>  		iap->ia_valid = ATTR_MTIME|ATTR_ATIME
>  			| ATTR_MTIME_SET|ATTR_ATIME_SET;
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.h b/fs/nfsd/vfs.h
> index 9a370a5..10dbe9f 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.h
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.h
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ __be32		nfsd_create(struct svc_rqst *, struct svc_fh *,
>  				int type, dev_t rdev, struct svc_fh *res);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NFSD_V3
>  __be32		nfsd_access(struct svc_rqst *, struct svc_fh *, u32 *, u32 *);
> -__be32		nfsd_create_v3(struct svc_rqst *, struct svc_fh *,
> +__be32		do_nfsd_create(struct svc_rqst *, struct svc_fh *,
>  				char *name, int len, struct iattr *attrs,
>  				struct svc_fh *res, int createmode,
>  				u32 *verifier, int *truncp, int *created);
> -- 
> 1.7.4.4
> 
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2011-04-20 21:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-06  9:04 [PATCH] nfsd41: make sure nfs server process OPEN with EXCLUSIVE4_1 correcttly Mi Jinlong
2011-04-07 19:50 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-04-08  9:57   ` Mi Jinlong
2011-04-18 20:07     ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-04-20  9:20       ` Mi Jinlong
2011-04-20 21:00         ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110420210020.GG15919@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.