From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <nyoushchenko@mvista.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] x86: signal: sys_rt_sigreturn() should use set_current_blocked()
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 20:12:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110423181231.GA1472@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110422151418.3639a131@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
On 04/22, Matt Fleming wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:46:41 +0200
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Normally sys_rt_sigreturn() restores the old current->blocked which was
> > changed by handle_signal(), and unblocking is always fine.
> >
> > But the debugger or application itself can change frame->uc_sigmask and
> > thus we need set_current_blocked()->retarget_shared_pending().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@linux.intel.com>
Thanks Matt.
> But does sys_sigreturn() also need this change?
Of course, it needs. From 0/7:
Once again: if we need this, then we need a lot more (trivial) changes
like 6/7 and 7/7. Basically every change of ->blocked should be converted
to use set_current_blocked().
6 and 7 are simple examples, most of the other changes will look similary.
Except sys_rt_sigtimedwait(), it changes both ->real_blocked and blocked,
see the patches I sent. sys_sigprocmask() is a bit annoying, but the
necessary changes are simple.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-23 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-18 13:44 [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] signal: sigprocmask fixes Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-18 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] signal: introduce retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 12:04 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 10:49 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] signal: retarget_shared_pending: consider shared/unblocked signals only Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 12:22 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 10:52 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 15:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 16:19 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 17:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 17:11 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-26 19:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-28 15:26 ` [PATCHSET] signals-review branch Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-30 12:51 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] signal: retarget_shared_pending: optimize while_each_thread() loop Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 12:26 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 11:03 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] signal: sigprocmask: narrow the scope of ->siglock Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 12:31 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 11:05 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] signal: sigprocmask() should do retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 12:46 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 11:14 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] x86: signal: handle_signal() should use set_current_blocked() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 13:45 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 11:19 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] x86: signal: sys_rt_sigreturn() " Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 14:14 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-23 18:12 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-04-25 11:21 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 8/7] signal: cleanup sys_rt_sigprocmask() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 14:30 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-23 18:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-23 18:47 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 11:26 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 17:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] signal: sigprocmask fixes Linus Torvalds
2011-04-18 17:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-18 17:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-23 17:59 ` [PATCH 0/3] do_sigtimedwait() needs retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-23 17:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] signal: sys_rt_sigtimedwait: simplify the timeout logic Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 11:37 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 17:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 17:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-25 17:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 19:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-26 10:18 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-23 17:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] signal: introduce do_sigtimedwait() to factor out compat/native code Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 11:39 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 11:49 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 15:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 16:25 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-26 10:28 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-23 18:00 ` [PATCH 3/3] signal: do_sigtimedwait() needs retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 11:52 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 16:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 16:27 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 17:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 17:12 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-26 10:40 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-26 10:42 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-26 19:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] sigtimedwait/sigprocmask need retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-26 19:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] signal: sys_rt_sigtimedwait: simplify the timeout logic Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-26 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] signal: introduce do_sigtimedwait() to factor out compat/native code Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-27 10:09 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-27 21:24 ` Matt Fleming
2011-05-11 16:21 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-05-12 18:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-13 16:44 ` [PATCH] signal: trivial, fix the "timespec declared inside parameter list" warning Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-13 18:09 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-05-16 12:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-16 12:57 ` [PATCH v2] " Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-16 17:39 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-05-18 23:37 ` Andrew Morton
2011-05-19 18:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-19 19:21 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-04-26 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] signal: do_sigtimedwait() needs retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-26 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] signal: cleanup sys_sigprocmask() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-27 10:12 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-27 21:31 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-26 19:50 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] signal: sys_sigprocmask() needs retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-26 21:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-27 12:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-27 13:04 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-01 20:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-01 20:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-26 19:50 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] signal: rename signandsets() to sigandnsets() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-27 10:11 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-27 21:43 ` Matt Fleming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110423181231.GA1472@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@console-pimps.org \
--cc=nyoushchenko@mvista.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.